Login

russian armor

Centaur

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (5)down
6 Nov 2015, 19:42 PM
#81
avatar of Junaid

Posts: 509

The centaur's performance should match that of the Ostwind. Both have same unit price
7 Nov 2015, 07:40 AM
#82
avatar of Noscul

Posts: 19

I find that the Centaur preforms better than the ostwind as an anti infantry unit however they seem to have different tactics that each one excels at like hit and runs, flanking or just sitting behind infantry and killing. As of now the centaur is in a good spot and I dont want to risk any changes that will make it like before.
7 Nov 2015, 13:05 PM
#83
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Nov 2015, 19:38 PMWrath


HOW DARE the Axis have anything over the allies.

This thread is a joke.


jump backJump back to quoted post6 Nov 2015, 19:42 PMJunaid
The centaur's performance should match that of the Ostwind. Both have same unit price


the centaur cost more than the ostwind, 320mp 100 fuel vs 280 mp 100 fuel.

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Nov 2015, 07:40 AMNoscul
I find that the Centaur preforms better than the ostwind as an anti infantry unit however they seem to have different tactics that each one excels at like hit and runs, flanking or just sitting behind infantry and killing. As of now the centaur is in a good spot and I dont want to risk any changes that will make it like before.


the current centaur hardly kill better than the ostwind.
7 Nov 2015, 15:04 PM
#84
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Centaur and ostwind both need reduction to 75 fuel.Considering su-76 price and utility .
7 Nov 2015, 15:47 PM
#85
avatar of Noscul

Posts: 19

I had a game with the brits and ostheer today and I still feel that the centaur preforms better the ostwind, not dramatically like before but its noticeable it may be more consistency then performance. I also tested that with the centaurs vet 1 strafe you can clear an at gun frontally faster then you could prepatch with auto attacks if you make the area super tiny, not sure on its effect against clumped AT guns but I cant imagine it being too different.
8 Nov 2015, 00:07 AM
#86
avatar of Junaid

Posts: 509





the centaur cost more than the ostwind, 320mp 100 fuel vs 280 mp 100 fuel.




Then match the prices and the performances.
8 Nov 2015, 01:11 AM
#87
avatar of EugeneTheDestroyer

Posts: 43

As a heavy anti infantry counter centaur seems to the job well, it is almost like a mobile medium armour bofors emplacement. However against more balanced enemy armies a cromwell counters more units making it the better choice.

as for fractions being A symmetrical that's a whole different discussion.....
3 Oct 2019, 23:22 PM
#88
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
its garbage. I used it so many times it simply doesnt kill. ur constantly just losing it.U have to be scared all the time to lose it vs schreks/.
KV8 is the only good anti inf tank.
4 Oct 2019, 00:57 AM
#89
avatar of Antemurale
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 951

This thread is from 2015. If you wish to discuss this unit, please make a new thread.

/locked.
PAGES (5)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

630 users are online: 630 guests
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49388
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM