Login

russian armor

Panzer 4 penetration.

3 Nov 2015, 14:02 PM
#41
avatar of varunax

Posts: 210


No editing, no tricks. Just made them fight straight up 1st recording through.

Panzer IV has better penetration than the Sherman, Cromwell and T34 at longer ranges (which is standard engagement range). It beats out any medium tank the majority of the time.

It has more armor than any other medium tank.

At vet2, it has more armor than an EZ8. What are people trying to argue here?

The Ausf J. version is literally almost on par with the EZ8, with the EZ8 having a slight upper hand.
3 Nov 2015, 14:16 PM
#42
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

3x +5% armour bullitin for OKW Pz4 makes it pretty even to beat a EZ8
3 Nov 2015, 14:26 PM
#43
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

I wish they would add increased pen at vet 3 or something.
3 Nov 2015, 14:34 PM
#44
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

Thank you for unbiased poll austerlitz :thumbsup:

As for the topic: its not p4 that needs cost decrease, its the BP2.
3 Nov 2015, 15:01 PM
#45
avatar of Ace of Swords

Posts: 219

Like most other players I use P4s to deal with allies infantry rather than with allies tanks since you have tank destroyers and At guns for that job.

And when thinking about the AI role the P4 is clearly over priced in that sector, being easily outperformed by sherman (due HE Shells) and by cromwells (due high speed crush). P4 vs Shermans vs Cromwell is rather a RNG fest, unless it's the P4 okw, so you could say they perform on the same level against each other.
I think it would be ok to decrease to costs of P4 to Sherman/Cromwell level, while reducing the P4 OKW version by 10 fuel, to show its superiority over Cromwell/Sherman.


+1 to this
3 Nov 2015, 16:29 PM
#46
avatar of Horasu

Posts: 279


No editing, no tricks. Just made them fight straight up 1st recording through.

Panzer IV has better penetration than the Sherman, Cromwell and T34 at longer ranges (which is standard engagement range). It beats out any medium tank the majority of the time.

It has more armor than any other medium tank.

At vet2, it has more armor than an EZ8. What are people trying to argue here?

The Ausf J. version is literally almost on par with the EZ8, with the EZ8 having a slight upper hand.




let me ask you this..

why does the Pershing "Heavy" tank which comes at 13 cp from a doctrinal commander and costs 600mp and 230fuel and also is limited to 1 LOSE to the cheaper non tech Panther that also DOESNT HAVE a limit of 1?

why should the panzer 4 beat the E8??

does the t34-76 beat Panzer 4s??

does the sherman beat Panzer 4s??



These two posts are the reasons I believe p4 is fine. That amazing armor is compounded by its frankly ridiculous vet 2. It's the best workhorse medium tank in the game, period.
3 Nov 2015, 16:35 PM
#47
avatar of Switzerland
Donator 33

Posts: 545

LOL the T 34-76 being in Tier 4 for that performance.
3 Nov 2015, 16:40 PM
#48
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

LOL the T 34-76 being in Tier 4 for that performance.


"its fine spam it"

3 Nov 2015, 16:57 PM
#49
avatar of Switzerland
Donator 33

Posts: 545



"its fine spam it"



Oh Brad <444>3
3 Nov 2015, 17:11 PM
#50
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 14:26 PMTobis
I wish they would add increased pen at vet 3 or something.


Actually, that's something I want to see for all mediums, mostly T34/76.
Phy
3 Nov 2015, 17:18 PM
#51
avatar of Phy

Posts: 509 | Subs: 1

Seriously, there are a few axis units which need a buff. But certainly it is not p4.
3 Nov 2015, 17:29 PM
#52
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 17:11 PMRMMLz


Actually, that's something I want to see for all mediums, mostly T34/76.

Like getting 34/76 to vet3 possible is in other circumstances then sinking tiger crossing the ice :sibHyena:
3 Nov 2015, 17:37 PM
#53
avatar of SpaceHamster
Patrion 14

Posts: 474


Like getting 34/76 to vet3 possible is in other circumstances then sinking tiger crossing the ice :sibHyena:


Can confirm, my t34 got to vet 3 when it rammed a tiger in the ice :foreveralone:
3 Nov 2015, 17:39 PM
#54
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

I would like to see a cromwell buff first
3 Nov 2015, 17:46 PM
#55
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

It can't even penetrate the rear of an IS-2...it needs some pen buff.
4 Nov 2015, 00:42 AM
#56
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

Like most other players I use P4s to deal with allies infantry rather than with allies tanks since you have tank destroyers and At guns for that job.

And when thinking about the AI role the P4 is clearly over priced in that sector, being easily outperformed by sherman (due HE Shells) and by cromwells (due high speed crush). P4 vs Shermans vs Cromwell is rather a RNG fest, unless it's the P4 okw, so you could say they perform on the same level against each other.
I think it would be ok to decrease to costs of P4 to Sherman/Cromwell level, while reducing the P4 OKW version by 10 fuel, to show its superiority over Cromwell/Sherman.


34/76 vs pIV is also (or at least was for quite a while) an RNG fest that the 34/76 could win, despite costing 25 less fuel than a pIV and for some of that time having better AI. the pIV is certainly the better tank though.

point being that as long as relic doesn't have standardized prices for similar things it's really hard to judge cost efficiency of similar units between the factions.

It can't even penetrate the rear of an IS-2...it needs some pen buff.


IS-2 has 205 rear armour and the pIV has pens of 120/110/100. a pIV has at best a 59% and at worst a 48% chance of penetrating the rear armour of a IS-2. both of those values are greater than 3%, the cutoff value on penetration, and thus, at all ranges, the pIV can penetrate the rear armour of an IS-2.

i don't feel like doing the numbers but the same is true the frontal armour, with a lower pen chance.
4 Nov 2015, 02:10 AM
#57
avatar of CadianGuardsman

Posts: 348

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 08:21 AMUnited


The Panzer is a general purpose tank. The Stug is the dedicated tank fighter.


I meant to write Panther Panzer lol my bad. :/
4 Nov 2015, 02:23 AM
#58
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

It can't even penetrate the rear of an IS-2...it needs some pen buff.
The allies mediums have the same problem with Tigers. It's a problem with the rear armor of heavies, not the P4.
4 Nov 2015, 02:28 AM
#59
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

The allies mediums have the same problem with Tigers. It's a problem with the rear armor of heavies, not the P4.

Indeed. Nerf all heavies' rear armour, that would be a systematic change long overdone for the viability of most base tier mediums.
4 Nov 2015, 02:36 AM
#60
avatar of wandererraven

Posts: 353

panzer 4 good for deal any workhorse but not good to spam like sherman T-34 for Flank Heavy tank because their Low pen in close range
they need Stug 3 or Pak 40 For help to deal Heavy and use Panzer 4 for tanker role (if lost can replace to Panther )
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

813 users are online: 813 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM