Login

russian armor

Why flamethrower on Strumpios?

2 Nov 2015, 01:51 AM
#101
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Needs to be dual flamethrower to be worth it.


No it doesn't.

Sturmpios greatest weakness was being shot from garrisons or heavy cover. Flamer heavily mitigates that except for at very long ranges. Any engagement in medium range sturmpios can win 1-1 more or less with the flamer.

I've found it incredibly useful.
2 Nov 2015, 02:25 AM
#102
avatar of Puppetmaster
Patrion 310

Posts: 871

What do people think about the timing of flamers? Do you feel 1cp is a bit too early considering that sturmpios are already quite potent early game?
2 Nov 2015, 07:37 AM
#103
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

What do people think about the timing of flamers? Do you feel 1cp is a bit too early considering that sturmpios are already quite potent early game?


it's early but i think it needs to be early to be a viable upgrade. the early game is when players have the least number of garrison counters available.
2 Nov 2015, 11:28 AM
#104
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

What do people think about the timing of flamers? Do you feel 1cp is a bit too early considering that sturmpios are already quite potent early game?

Yes it is pretty early and are very good for sturms but the other flamers are available from the start. (exept rileman)
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

United Kingdom 304
Peru 25
New Zealand 7
unknown 3
United States 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

952 users are online: 952 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM