Login

russian armor

Pershing

PAGES (9)down
14 Oct 2015, 17:50 PM
#1
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15



USF PLAYERS. It's time. For years we have endured paper tanks, paper infantry...

But now, men.

Times have changed! Our riflemen are smart and beefy as ever, our new Pershing tanks are finally a match for the German tanks.

And now, our battle hardened Rangers, will turn the tide of battle.

USF PLAYERS. I ask that you BELIEVE,

NO!

I ask that you KNOW

THAT USF IS FINALLY OP.

God bless ALL USF PLAYERS/FANBOIS that have withered the storm through these many months.

The time is now, gentlemen.
14 Oct 2015, 17:52 PM
#2
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Then people use Pershing and find that it has 800 health, 290 armor and no crew.
14 Oct 2015, 17:53 PM
#3
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

14 Oct 2015, 17:54 PM
#4
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

No more paper armor tanks!

And then we realize that Pershing has 800HP and 250 armor :guyokay:
14 Oct 2015, 17:54 PM
#5
avatar of Fuzz
Donator 11

Posts: 98

Ranger blobs incoming :romeoHype:
14 Oct 2015, 18:00 PM
#6
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

USA USA USA USA USA!
14 Oct 2015, 18:01 PM
#7
avatar of m00nch1ld
Donator 11

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1

i heard vet1 ability are mine sweepers :luvCarrot:

vroom vroom into enemy base dodging all the mines :snfQuinn:
14 Oct 2015, 18:02 PM
#8
avatar of SpaceHamster
Patrion 14

Posts: 474

Even if the Pershings tanking mode sucks, it will still be better than the Jackson.

I bet you it will have its own special pathing mode like the churchill does so it will be 100x better than the jackson for pathing alone.
14 Oct 2015, 18:02 PM
#9
14 Oct 2015, 18:02 PM
#10
avatar of 6. Panzerarmee
Patrion 26

Posts: 42

Ok Lelic know you need to explain why you give USF more to blobb.
14 Oct 2015, 18:03 PM
#11
avatar of hannibalbarcajr

Posts: 503

Since they are asking for naming help on these commanders, I suggest "Go ahead and Alt+F4 now" for this one...rangers and a Pershing wow.
14 Oct 2015, 18:04 PM
#12
avatar of SpaceHamster
Patrion 14

Posts: 474

Since they are asking for naming help on these commanders, I suggest "Go ahead and Alt+F4 now" for this one...rangers and a Pershing wow.


Plus, rifle mines.

Why even go infantry company commander now? :foreveralone:
14 Oct 2015, 18:09 PM
#13
avatar of Highfiveeeee

Posts: 1740

Then people use Pershing and find that it has 800 health, 290 armor and no crew.




14 Oct 2015, 18:10 PM
#14
avatar of hannibalbarcajr

Posts: 503



Plus, rifle mines.

Why even go infantry company commander now? :foreveralone:

ZE PRIEST YOU HERETIC! J/K....good point.
14 Oct 2015, 18:15 PM
#15
avatar of Tetley

Posts: 187

Spend ages to try and get rid of call on gameplay to have a commander released that will end up championing it...
14 Oct 2015, 18:17 PM
#16
avatar of Zansibar

Posts: 158 | Subs: 2

More relevant than ever

14 Oct 2015, 18:27 PM
#17
avatar of Zansibar

Posts: 158 | Subs: 2



Plus, rifle mines.

Why even go infantry company commander now? :foreveralone:


Artillery and auto unlockable LMGs?
14 Oct 2015, 18:27 PM
#18
avatar of The Big Red 1

Posts: 758

Ok Lelic know you need to explain why you give USF more to blobb.

lol there's still the shreck blob and thats walking into a circle of death for armor
14 Oct 2015, 18:49 PM
#20
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

I want my IS-3
PAGES (9)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

518 users are online: 518 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49184
Welcome our newest member, Eastman04
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM