Playing USF is a waste of time in team games

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 07:12 AMAirborne

http://coh2chart.com/
And go the 4v4.
That doesn´t seem to be very strong
But it is just a sad as soviet, so i think we need to wait at the brits to changes 4v4 balans

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 02:51 AMNorthWeapon

Your randoms stats:

OKW: 130 matches
USF: 0 matches
USSR: 1 match
OST: 388 matches

Your AT stats:

Axis: 556
Allies: 4

Okay... that is one issue. But you're going to be active in the balance forums with these stats!?!?!? Are you a moron... or? Man people like you don't deserve to sign up for the forum cuz Axis is all you'll play and still say "nerf Allies buff Axis" when you don't even play Allies.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 07:12 AMAirborne

http://coh2chart.com/
And go the 4v4.
That doesn´t seem to be very strong
But it is just a sad as soviet, so i think we need to wait at the brits to changes 4v4 balans

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 10:18 AMKronosaur0s

Its easy, no joke, in my games I always build Jacksons and kill every Jagdtiger

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 10:51 AMKyleAkira

Maybe with mortar crew and at gun from hq it can be more balanced, about Pershing commander it shouldn't have any arty nor infantry upgrade on it.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 01:06 AMMittens

USF even with the upcoming patch so far looks like a 1v1 faction. Brits on the contrary look like the exact opposite of being a team faction and not a 1v1

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 17:15 PMpussyking

At 1 vs 1 I have +6 winning streak as USF (http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198111117245/standings), but large team games are totally not fit for the USF which is too fragile and weak for big games.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 09:02 AMNorthWeapon

Finally... someone that appreciates NUMBERS AND STATISTICS OVER SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.
Snip

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 09:02 AMNorthWeapon

Finally... someone that appreciates NUMBERS AND STATISTICS OVER SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS.

4v4 winrates:

Ostheer = 83%
OKW = 88%
USSR = 52%
USF = 56%

There's just so many reasons Allies is inferior to Axis in 4v4s that I will consider you insane/overly-biased/trolling if you believe otherwise.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 18:49 PMchipwreckt

Never played 3v4/ 4v4 randoms BUT in AT when USF I only see Airborne as an option.

I go something like 4 RE + LT + AAHT . After that get 3x Para's with LMGs and get Major + Scots + drop AT gun. If floating build ammo caches. Save like 600 ammo and Ez win, rek all shitty Axis armor with P47's and all shitty Axis infantry with vet3 para's. Kappachino.

Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2015, 22:15 PMKronosaur0s

pffff its easy man, I win a lot of game as USF, stop exaggerating

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 02:51 AMNorthWeapon

Your randoms stats:

OKW: 130 matches
USF: 0 matches
USSR: 1 match
OST: 388 matches

Your AT stats:

Axis: 556
Allies: 4

Okay... that is one issue. But you're going to be active in the balance forums with these stats!?!?!? Are you a moron... or? Man people like you don't deserve to sign up for the forum cuz Axis is all you'll play and still say "nerf Allies buff Axis" when you don't even play Allies.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 19:48 PMTrubbbel

Where did you get the numbers from and what do they mean?

I'm not surprised be thought of as insane/overly-biased/trolling. That's what balanced people usually say. Go check on my fresh random 4v4 stats. +3 wins at the moment of writing with the usf. But you'll probably throw reasons for why that doesn't count.

Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2015, 18:49 PMchipwreckt

Never played 3v4/ 4v4 randoms BUT in AT when USF I only see Airborne as an option.

I go something like 4 RE + LT + AAHT . After that get 3x Para's with LMGs and get Major + Scots + drop AT gun. If floating build ammo caches. Save like 600 ammo and Ez win, rek all shitty Axis armor with P47's and all shitty Axis infantry with vet3 para's. Kappachino.