the OKW P4--a specialist generalist
Posts: 395
At 135 fuel (plus the OKW shortage) it is no doubt priced above its weight class but that's the beauty. The OKW aren't supposed to have a generalist unit. But having 0 kinda sucks and makes the faction gimmicky. With a steeply priced P4, they have a generalist--if they can spare the micro and fuel that is. It's a sort of specialist generalist. That is, it's specialization IS being a generalist.
It's pretty neat I think.
Also, while Elite armor still sucks, it's an improvement for the doctrine nonetheless. The Troll Tiger gives it a reason to pick and buildable solo P4s are way more useful than the old P4 call in. Also, the P4 is a good platform for HEAT rounds. Panther doesn't need em. Puma is dead if it's facing something that needs them.
All in all great change and I highly recommend this unit (and a 5 fuel adjustment. 135 is a tad steep I feel)
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
BUT.....!
Prediction: sooner than we think there will be at least an okw PZIV OP thread. For sure!
Posts: 1701
Yes, OKW PIV is a superbe unit and I draw back all my concerns related to its price. OKW feels actualy as a verry good faction choice currently.
BUT.....!
Prediction: sooner than we think there will be at least an okw PZIV OP thread. For sure!
Oh do ya really think? my prediction is in some days
Posts: 600
Its overpriced at 135 (should be 125 max).
Posts: 589
With heavy delay, making it pretty impossible for any faction to wait for call in's, this unit fits perfectly in the game as it stands.
Posts: 476
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I never get a P4 purely because every time i do... i find myself wishing i waited for 40 more fuel because they now have Jacksons/SU85's and i need a panther.
Its overpriced at 135 (should be 125 max).
Have you considered... I don't know.... NOT using tanks to counter tank destroyers and instead using... I don't know.... puppchens and shrecks?
And good luck believing 230 armor tank should cost the same as 180 armor tank with all other stats being same. I can't even tell anymore if you're so naive or so biased to even suggest that laughable change.
Posts: 830
Have you considered... I don't know.... NOT using tanks to counter tank destroyers and instead using... I don't know.... puppchens and shrecks?
And good luck believing 230 armor tank should cost the same as 180 armor tank with all other stats being same. I can't even tell anymore if you're so naive or so biased to even suggest that laughable change.
If we take your logic into consideration, basing cost upon armor value, the Is2 should be more expensive than the KingTiger
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Have you considered... I don't know.... NOT using tanks to counter tank destroyers and instead using... I don't know.... puppchens and shrecks?
And good luck believing 230 armor tank should cost the same as 180 armor tank with all other stats being same. I can't even tell anymore if you're so naive or so biased to even suggest that laughable change.
If we take your logic into consideration, basing cost upon armor value, the Is2 should be more expensive than the KingTiger
0/10
L2Read
Posts: 589
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If we take your logic into consideration, basing cost upon armor value, the Is2 should be more expensive than the KingTiger
Let me guess, comprehensive reading wasn't your favorite thing at school or even one you were half good at?
Posts: 513
If we take your logic into consideration, basing cost upon armor value, the Is2 should be more expensive than the KingTiger
either u cant read or don't understand logic, maybe both
Posts: 88
Let me guess, comprehensive reading wasn't your favorite thing at school or even one you were half good at?
I like that you are allowed to throw arround insults like that, also nice to see that you say suggestions are laughable. You totally dont reinforce that lonely forum warrior stereotype.
Regarding the P4, I really like it how it is right now especially to harass the flanks. Together with a JP i feel confident to take on anything the enemy throws at me.
What concerns me tho is the Sturmtiger, which seems to be a little over the top right now, but that could just be me getting really lucky. I have not seen it used against me but i would like to hear other players impressions.
Posts: 1891
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Have you considered... I don't know.... NOT using tanks to counter tank destroyers and instead using... I don't know.... puppchens and shrecks?
And good luck believing 230 armor tank should cost the same as 180 armor tank with all other stats being same. I can't even tell anymore if you're so naive or so biased to even suggest that laughable change.
Actually the correct answer is that Ostheer PIV should cost less, hth.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Actually the correct answer is that Ostheer PIV should cost less, hth.
Which would require to make sherman cheaper, because its weaker, which would require T34 being cheaper which is just a garbage anyway.
See, this is why you're not fixing stuff that isn't broken, you leave it alone.
Livestreams
84 | |||||
2 | |||||
150 | |||||
17 | |||||
14 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM