Panzerfaust vs AT nade

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2013, 16:39 PMBartonPL

Both things are lame, only usefull when you want to slow other tank, but it deals no damage.

Hee's what i think should be done

- Panzerfaust damage 1.5 or 1.75 to AT nade (for example, AT nade deals 100 damage so fanzerfaust will deal 150/175 damage)
- Remove any kind of engine damages from panzerfaust
- Panzerfaust should have lesser range than AT nade

And now look at this, panzerfaust finally deals some damage and it's worth using it, AT nade is only to slow down german tanks

It's like Panzerfaust and Stickies in Coh1 which is a good idea IMO, that's how these weapons should look like

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2013, 16:39 PMBartonPL

Both things are lame, only usefull when you want to slow other tank, but it deals no damage.

Hee's what i think should be done

- Panzerfaust damage 1.5 or 1.75 to AT nade (for example, AT nade deals 100 damage so fanzerfaust will deal 150/175 damage)
- Remove any kind of engine damages from panzerfaust
- Panzerfaust should have lesser range than AT nade

And now look at this, panzerfaust finally deals some damage and it's worth using it, AT nade is only to slow down german tanks

It's like Panzerfaust and Stickies in Coh1 which is a good idea IMO, that's how these weapons should look like

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2013, 16:42 PMtalarfon

+1

-Though I see no reason why faust range should be smaller?
-Also they still should give a damaged engine to light vehicles (i.e clown car)