Star Wars Battlefront Alpha Application
Posts: 657
Application Link:http://starwars.ea.com/starwars/battlefront/alpha
System specs for the closed Battlefront alpha:
CPU: Quad Core CPU e.g. Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.8 GHz or AMD Phenom II x4 955 @ 3.2 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
RAM: 6 GB
OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64-bit operating system required)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon HD 7970 with 2 GB of Video Memory
I didn't get in but it sounds awesome! Post if you got in or not!
Posts: 830 | Subs: 2
I know that a lot of people in origin don't like star wars or never played a battlefield and got a Key FailFish
Posts: 640
Posts: 732
Posts: 374
Posts: 657
Aww. But I heard some very negative things about this game. They made everything super duper simple so "non- fps" Starwars fans will be able to play/understand it. Pls no auto aim console crap hopefully, pls Dice.I heard the same thing, over simplified game so casuals can easily get into it. Problem is that the specs required to play it well on PC are up there with Hardline and BF4, so someone would need a decent rig to play this well. Most people with even decent PCs would have played other games like that, and console players seem to have no problem playing battlefield. So it's either keep the game semi sophisticated to keep the battlefield people interested and alienate the super casuals or dumb it down and irritate the FPS crowd and focus on casuals.
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Aww. But I heard some very negative things about this game. They made everything super duper simple so "non- fps" Starwars fans will be able to play/understand it. Pls no auto aim console crap hopefully, pls Dice.You can always identify people that never played on console from posts like this. GTA and rockstar games have actual lock on targeting. CoD, Battlefield, Halo, etc. do not. They have "aim assist" which means when you are aiming near someone the look sensitivity is slower than when you are not. This way you can get a decent amount of precision while aiming at someone but retain a feasible turning speed when you are not aiming at someone. Its not "auto aim crap" I've played thousands of hours on pc and console, and a mouse is much more accurate than a console with aim assist, the console players have it harder than you do.
Posts: 309
You can always identify people that never played on console from posts like this.
Implying that's a bad thing lol
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
I've listened to a lot of youtubers and most of them all pretty much agree the ground combat is good, but vehicles and flying is totally lackluster. I'm still kind of keen to play it, at least for the co-op.
Implying that's a bad thing lol
Yes criticising something you are uninformed about is a bad thing.
Posts: 732
You can always identify people that never played on console from posts like this.
I fixed my post, np
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
About the game I enjoyed SWBF2, so as long as it hasn't taken a step backward from its predecessor I'll still enjoy it even if it doesn't feel like BF5.
Posts: 657
I got to test some ground combat here locally at EA a few months back, NDA and all but the ground combat is super solid, guns feel awesome and sound design is top notch.I heard it's pretty solid but I'm expecting in typical EA fashion to give us the bare bones and then pawn off 85% of the content in the form of DLC.
Posts: 194
but it will be a good game a year later:
Death Star Map Pack 10€
Space battles 20€
Galactic Conquest DLC 15€
Campaign DLC 15€
Content that should have been in the game Pack 25€
Content was cut out from the game Pack 10€
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
no ATAT, no space battles , no death star battle. GG WP EA&DICE
but it will be a good game a year later:
Death Star Map Pack 10€
Space battles 20€
Galactic Conquest DLC 15€
Campaign DLC 15€
Content that should have been in the game Pack 25€
Content was cut out from the game Pack 10€
exactly, im also so over with EA/DICE bullshit. It´s just fishing dumb people feeded by screens and hyp trailer. Played a long time BF3 competitive and with BF4 it was finally over because of making it to a game like "look at us we beat CoD", oh man, please, go out of my way with EA.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
no ATAT, no space battles , no death star battle. GG WP EA&DICE
but it will be a good game a year later:
Death Star Map Pack 10€
Space battles 20€
Galactic Conquest DLC 15€
Campaign DLC 15€
Content that should have been in the game Pack 25€
Content was cut out from the game Pack 10€
ATAT is in the game.
The biggest problem with their DLC is how it fragments the playerbase. They need to do something like Rising Storm where everyone gets maps but you are restricted to basic rifleman class, can't play heroes, etc. This is 2015, games look a lot nicer, get more substantial patches, have better sound and animations so don't expect the same price for games from 10 years ago unless you only buy niche small developer titles. If you don't want to spend over 60 hours on a game don't get all the DLC, if you do then you got your money worth. Gaming is one of the most cost efficient past times out there, bitching about dlc cost is petty. If you want overpriced af dlc buy all the coh2 camos commanders and mission DLCs.
Posts: 194
ATAT is in the game.
it is, but you cant control it
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Posts: 194
This game is going to a wrong way.
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34857.859+13
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, zowinfans
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM