Login

russian armor

Stuka a bit too much

PAGES (8)down
6 Jun 2015, 16:58 PM
#141
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jun 2015, 13:37 PM1[][]


Who's the scrub, the guy who pops red smoke for a big airplane to come or the guy that sticks around to get strafed WHILE being pinned by MG or getting mortared or shot at

unless it's on a noob map like road to kharkov it's 100% dodgeable unless you like to hang out on the edge of maps when your enemy has CAS doctrine

like i said, what kind of player can't dodge in these giant maps like lierneux? pls


The guy who pop the red smoke of course! :foreveralone:
7 Jun 2015, 02:13 AM
#142
avatar of RobocopHighlander

Posts: 55

Yeah, launch a good carefully planned attack combining your infantry and your tanks to try to take an important point of the map, and then "easily dodge" the loiter strafe by removing all of your tanks from the engagement, causing it to fail because now your infantry can't be supported. And be careful not to get too wrapped up in the micro of the now solely infantry-based attack, because sometimes the loiter plane will chase your tank around the map if the ability directly targeted the tank. Congratulations - you just lost map control and your well planned engagement due to the effort of "easily dodging" an overpowered ability.

If soviets had an ability that removed axis tanks from engagements whenever they felt like it, you could sustain life in the desert on the tears of axis fanboys. They already cry about p47s, which do much less damage spread over a much larger amount of time at double the cost of the loiter strafe. If you don't like p47, how can you like something that is better than p47 for less cost packaged in a doctrine that feeds ammo so you never run out?

For that matter, even if you think p47 is fine, you have to realize that something much better than p47 for much cheaper would have to be totally broken.
7 Jun 2015, 03:12 AM
#143
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

If soviets had an ability that removed axis tanks from engagements whenever they felt like it, you could sustain life in the desert on the tears of axis fanboys. .


LOL
8 Jun 2015, 06:20 AM
#144
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

I really don't see how some people can say that the P47 is OP, and then state that the Stuka loiter isn't for whatever reason. The Stuka deals large damage to units, can oneshot medium tanks and infantry squads, is cheaper, and can come with a heavy tank. The P47 is more expensive, has an AOE, has two planes (so is harder to kill), has less accuracy, cannot one shot medium tanks, and cannot target infantry. The stuka also generally shoots at lighter armor while the P47 strike fights heavier tanks.

Just looking at the stats of the two strikes, you can see a serious imbalance in terms of the cost effectiveness. If the JU87 loiter is going to be as powerful as it is now, it should at the least be as expensive as the P47 strike (I would argue that it needs to be more expensive). It is just silly that allied stock armor, which is much more fragile than axis armor, needs to deal with a strike that is as powerful as the stuka loiter. The argument that the Stuka CAS is needed to kill the IS2 is not an argument. The IS2 may be too powerful, but we cannot balance offmaps around singular units and ignore the rest of the armies. Otherwise, why not balance the IL2 strafe around fighting the King Tiger, and make it deal the same damage as the Stuka strafe?

I would rather see both strikes toned down. The loiter should be toned down to IL2 levels, with a similar cost. P47 may be ok, since USF doesn't really have other good counter to axis super heavy TDs. It may need to be less long lasting.

Just my opinion.
8 Jun 2015, 08:33 AM
#145
avatar of Brick Top

Posts: 1162

They already cry about p47s, which do much less damage spread over a much larger amount of time at double the cost of the loiter strafe. If you don't like p47, how can you like something that is better than p47 for less cost packaged in a doctrine that feeds ammo so you never run out?



Loiter stuka does not come with muni convert.

CAS stuka, which does come with muni convert, only makes one pass, and does not target, only hitting where you place it. Thats why it's dodgable.
8 Jun 2015, 14:31 PM
#146
avatar of OrangePest

Posts: 570 | Subs: 1

8 Jun 2015, 16:44 PM
#147
avatar of Rocket

Posts: 728

Just changed my opinion on this in a 2v2 game last night against double wher it is op as hell. It seems that it is impossible for a jackson to escape it it just is not fast enough to get out of the way I guess to me it seemed impossible to dodge it at all. Anti-tank strife broken as hell one clicks away full hp allied tanks, p47 in comparison does way less dmg and is way less effective. They could basicly delete our jacksons or shermans leaving us no way to fight there tigers at all other than try to steal their paks.
PAGES (8)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

635 users are online: 635 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM