Posts: 2053
Lock veteran riflemen to cp 2-3, but make it consistently give vet 2 rifles. That way it can't be abused early game, and gives USF player easy to replace riflemen for late game. Nerf vet gain so it takes longer for them to get to vet 3 though than say a normal vet 2 riflemen. 20 more manpower for a squad that already has vet and is a call in is a steal.
Posts: 738
Flamers are fine,those are not the problem in that doctrine.
Posts: 300
 | Playercard of PyroPlazma | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 372
Posts: 959
Funny things... Defensive stance is used to attack and bliztkrieg is used to run away...
Soviet: abuse at finest Posts: 108 | Subs: 1
Flamers on core infantry is fine? Flamer/zook spam is borderline broken vs OKW.
IMO the flame thrower should take up two slots, same with the 1919.
Posts: 692
Posts: 1740
2 
Posts: 83
Posts: 1484
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1484
So you want flame riflemen with 0 explode chance ? wow, sounds OP xD
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1484
So you want a flamer squad good at all range, with smoke, nades, and AT nades and which can equip an additional Bar ? with 0 drawback ? for real ?
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Rifle flamer its the same as engie flamer, it have a drawback, its powerful but can explode, 0 reason that rifle flamers should not explode.
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
I thought the drawback was to close the range to be effective.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
So you want flame riflemen with 0 explode chance ? wow, sounds OP xD
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Rifle flamer its the same as engie flamer, it have a drawback, its powerful but can explode, 0 reason that rifle flamers should not explode.
Nope, but to be able to buy it again.
8 Posts: 2470
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
