Login

russian armor

Alpha Announcement

17 Apr 2015, 11:16 AM
#81
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

I had a nightmare that I got into the alpha but it was actually just a new Russian faction themed around Bagration.


Your nightmare is my dream, heheh...

But for now, bring on the British!


My personal theory is that if the Brits are themed around late-war Italian campaign, the new OKW commanders could be themed around this too, providing Italian auxiliaries to the core German army.


So basically Mobile Defense Doctrine B-)
17 Apr 2015, 11:30 AM
#82
avatar of FaustCostBulletin

Posts: 521



Your nightmare is my dream, heheh...


I actually don't see what would be particularly wrong with that. :)
17 Apr 2015, 15:26 PM
#83
avatar of REforever

Posts: 314

I don't really like the idea of letting anyone sign up. Alpha testing is important in that the players participating can influence the balance of the game; with this is mind, only top 100 players from 1v1 and 2v2 ranked should be allowed to enter. I definitely wouldn't have faith in the balance team if Relic accepted a rank 2000 Rus only player into the Alpha.

17 Apr 2015, 15:29 PM
#84
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

I don't really like the idea of letting anyone sign up. Alpha testing is important in that the players participating can influence the balance of the game; with this is mind, only top 100 players from 1v1 and 2v2 ranked should be allowed to enter. I definitely wouldn't have faith in the balance team if Relic accepted a rank 2000 Rus only player into the Alpha.


Would that mean that you would lost faith in the balance if you got in?

Last time discussions on balance and feedback was really good and you could extremely easily see the "limited" players and just disregard them.

There still needs to be somewhat meaningful poll of players to get as much automatch games as possible to spot and possibly solve the problems. Mistakes of OKW should not be repeated.
17 Apr 2015, 15:37 PM
#85
avatar of REforever

Posts: 314

I'm a top 100 player in ranked 2v2, so obviously a spot should be reserved for me(If I do decide to sign up) but anyone with a rank higher than 200 in 1v1 and 2v2 ranked shouldn't be in the Alhpa; there should be plenty of players in the top200 though for Alhpa testing, instead of only a handful of individuals.
17 Apr 2015, 15:43 PM
#86
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513

I'm a top 100 player in ranked 2v2, so obviously a spot should be reserved for me(If I do decide to sign up) but anyone with a rank higher than 200 in 1v1 and 2v2 ranked shouldn't be in the Alhpa; there should be plenty of players in the top200 though for Alhpa testing, instead of only a handful of individuals.


Oh top 100 2v2 with OKW only, what a surprise.
17 Apr 2015, 15:48 PM
#87
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

Has anyone received notification that they are in this alpha? (PS: this is different from the balancing alpha)
17 Apr 2015, 15:52 PM
#88
avatar of kamk
Donator 11

Posts: 764

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 15:48 PMNapalm
Has anyone received notification that they are in this alpha? (PS: this is different from the balancing alpha)

I remember a post by Cynthia, where she says the notifications for everyone go out on april the 28th.
17 Apr 2015, 15:53 PM
#89
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

Thanks kamk.
17 Apr 2015, 15:59 PM
#90
avatar of Mortar
Donator 22

Posts: 559

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 15:52 PMkamk

I remember a post by Cynthia, where she says the notifications for everyone go out on april the 28th.


In yesterdays stream she stated notifications would go out to everybody regardless if you are picked or not and that some could come earlier than the 28th. So keep your eyes peeled on inbox (and possibly your junk mail box too).
17 Apr 2015, 15:59 PM
#91
avatar of kamk
Donator 11

Posts: 764

Np Napalm.


Btw.:
I'm a top 100 player in ranked 2v2, so obviously a spot should be reserved for me(If I do decide to sign up) but anyone with a rank higher than 200 in 1v1 and 2v2 ranked shouldn't be in the Alhpa; there should be plenty of players in the top200 though for Alhpa testing, instead of only a handful of individuals.

To be fair, for the general balancing and details i would agree, but counter mechanics still need to be feasible for the common casual crowd.
There's no point in having a game where half the counters can only be used by a handful of players.
17 Apr 2015, 16:00 PM
#92
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

If they let only top 100 players there would be not enough people to play and test fresh updates over course of beta.

17 Apr 2015, 16:19 PM
#93
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 16:00 PMJadame!
If they let only top 100 players there would be not enough people to play and test fresh updates over course of beta.



Just have "Show playercard" around the avatar on the forums. This would make reading some comments way faster.
17 Apr 2015, 17:12 PM
#94
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Playercards are just a way for people to tell each other why their opinions don't matter
17 Apr 2015, 17:20 PM
#95
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

Playercards are just a way for people to tell each other why their opinions don't matter


+1
17 Apr 2015, 17:25 PM
#96
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Playercards are just a way for people to tell each other why their opinions don't matter


How much you have played a faction matters a lot more than rank. There is a large amount of people who comment on the design of factions they have literally never played more than two or three times.
17 Apr 2015, 17:27 PM
#97
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

Playercards are just a way for people to tell each other why their opinions don't matter


Yup. A good game designer (in terms of balance in this case) is not necessarily a skilled gamer. A good car designer is not necessarily a good driver. Although, game knowledge is tied to skill level to some extent.
17 Apr 2015, 17:28 PM
#98
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2



How much you have played a faction matters a lot more than rank. There is a large amount of people who comment on the design of factions they have literally never played more than two or three times.


Agreed
17 Apr 2015, 17:41 PM
#99
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 17:27 PMRMMLz


Yup. A good game designer (in terms of balance in this case) is not necessarily a skilled gamer. A good car designer is not necessarily a good driver. Although, game knowledge is tied to skill level to some extent.


Neat analogy ;)
17 Apr 2015, 21:14 PM
#100
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Playercards are just a way for people to tell each other why their opinions don't matter


You don't judge the quality of a post by the playercard.
But a bad quality post, in combination with constant whining, with a single faction played on a single mode at a "scrub" level...Yeah, i'm gonna keep wasting time reading it or waste time discussing with.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

704 users are online: 704 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49101
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM