Only noobs think this OP bullshit sucks.
TD having spotters themselves is the most insulting bullshit to competitive RTS.
I could say the same about self-spotting Panthers
Posts: 4928
Only noobs think this OP bullshit sucks.
TD having spotters themselves is the most insulting bullshit to competitive RTS.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 551
Flank a speedy, turreted TD, Sir, you high?
Posts: 551
The only Panther in the game that can self spot with out upgrades is the Command Panther. And the Panther isn't a TD, it's a Tank Hunter.
Posts: 365
If you dont destroy 260 Fuel worth of Shermans they will do the same as a KT. Not sure what your getting at. Heavies make Mediums not viable. Similar to how the Jackson makes Ostheers T3 not AS viable or desirable considering they have a heavy option.
The Jackson comparison stands on the AT level. Why would you bother to go Medium if you knew it was voluntarily putting yourself on the backfoot? I sure as hell wouldnt. Give me a Tiger clone as the USF that I can stall for! I would pick it 9/10 times.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Tank what?
Posts: 4928
The only Panther in the game that can self spot with out upgrades is the Command Panther. And the Panther isn't a TD, it's a Tank Hunter.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
It's still 4 more options for sight range than Americans get. Also shouldn't a "Tank Destroyer" get the first blow as a vehicle meant to snipe tanks, rather than the "Tank Hunter" which is meant to chase them down? You're own explanation is flawed for that reason.
I'm not saying the Panther should be nerfed, but one of the most mobile and durable tank-killers in the game also has more options to increase it's sight than a fragile tank-destroyer which IRL was the one with good sight.
Posts: 2779
I got some news for you, coh2 was supposed to be a game of flanking, but axis players dont bother to flank becouse they dont need to. Just charge frontally, do damage, get back, repair and repeat. Pather getting away with main gun crit is the meta.
Posts: 471
Posts: 87
Posts: 1708 | Subs: 2
Posts: 365
A Tank Destroyer is a tank mainly focused around fighting enemy armor with support. Tank Hunters are highly mobile turreted tanks built for killing enemy tanks one on one. The T34/85 for example is a Tank Hunter.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
btw- all tanks that arent tank destroyers are basically tank hunters, except maybe the luchs..
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1705
You've got something confused.
Puma is dirt cheap tank destroyer.
StuG is dirt cheap.
M10 is dirt cheap.
Jackson costs as much as best stock medium tank and I haven't seen you boasting about P4 being dirt cheap.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Puma pathetic 80 penetration and 320 health.Killed in 2 shots.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1705
First of all, I have no idea why Jackson is so fragile because it had very good armor, better than Pz4.
- Damage from 240 to 160
- Armor from 130 to 190
- Penetration from 200/180/160 to 260/230/200
- Cost from 350/125 to 360/140
- HP from 480 to 640
- Reload from 7.25 to 6.50
Or give it this damn smoke.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I didn't defend this, Elefant, SU85, Zis, 57mm, are all like that, nubs friendly.
Puma pathetic 80 penetration and 320 health.Killed in 2 shots.
48 | |||||
15 | |||||
6 | |||||
2 | |||||
82 | |||||
61 | |||||
21 | |||||
8 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |