I know that maybe this is not fair as people from regular 2vs2 doesn't comunicate same as in aranged teams. However, it has lately been almost impossible to find a game in 2vs2 AT.
I suggest that after certain amount of time (2,3 mins of waiting) 2vs2AT get transfered to play with regular 2vs2. It does not need to count to ladder, but at least it will help in quicker finding of game.
You can say "just play the basic match", but it's full on anihilate/high resources type of games and the level of skill vary greatly.
(Suggestion) Merge 2vs2 AT and regular 2vs2 automatch
26 Dec 2014, 11:07 AM
#1
Posts: 6
26 Dec 2014, 18:03 PM
#2
Posts: 269 | Subs: 1
better relic would ban all 2v2rr barcounter 
and 2v2 at team againts 2v2 rr team is bullshit like in coh2
and 2v2 at team againts 2v2 rr team is bullshit like in coh2
26 Dec 2014, 18:39 PM
#3
Posts: 6
better relic would ban all 2v2rr barcounter
and 2v2 at team againts 2v2 rr team is bullshit like in coh2
Why would it be bull... I dont care much about the ladders, but I do like to play with a friend occasionally and waiting to get a match is too long. (Both automatch or basic match)
26 Dec 2014, 18:41 PM
#4
Posts: 862
I know that maybe this is not fair as people from regular 2vs2 doesn't comunicate same as in aranged teams. However, it has lately been almost impossible to find a game in 2vs2 AT.
I suggest that after certain amount of time (2,3 mins of waiting) 2vs2AT get transfered to play with regular 2vs2. It does not need to count to ladder, but at least it will help in quicker finding of game.
You can say "just play the basic match", but it's full on anihilate/high resources type of games and the level of skill vary greatly.
Errrr... No.
If the pickings are too slim for AT then both of you should just random on the same side (allies or axis). Good chances you will end up in the same game. If not, deal with it like the rest of us.
Or set up your own basic games with VPs and standard resources. I guarantee there are decent (or even better) people who will join it.
The advantages of an AT team aren't just TeamSpeak or Mumble, which are significant, it is that you have played together regularly and know each others roles in the team where randoms have to figure it out. Figuring it out is part of 2v2.
26 Dec 2014, 19:07 PM
#5
Posts: 269 | Subs: 1
Why would it be bull... I dont care much about the ladders, but I do like to play with a friend occasionally and waiting to get a match is too long. (Both automatch or basic match)
and then u rank as a random team againts an at team and u getting raped in 15 minutes wohooooo that was a nice game
26 Dec 2014, 19:48 PM
#6
1 
Posts: 92
I'm pretty sure AT is not just matched against other AT but randoms too
Show me a man with his feet planted firmly on the ground and I'll show you a man who can't take his pants off.
26 Dec 2014, 20:10 PM
#7
Posts: 292
I'm pretty sure AT is not just matched against other AT but randoms too
Was just about to say the exact same thing. I am quite sure that AT is mixed with randoms.
Edit: DERP, saw now that this is the CoH1 forum. In vCoH AT and randoms are separated.
Ade, mein liebes Schätzelein
26 Dec 2014, 20:49 PM
#8
Posts: 142
I'm pretty sure AT is not just matched against other AT but randoms too
we are talking about coh1
26 Dec 2014, 22:43 PM
#9
1 Posts: 92
Show me a man with his feet planted firmly on the ground and I'll show you a man who can't take his pants off.
27 Dec 2014, 11:19 AM
#10
Posts: 6
Errrr... No.
If the pickings are too slim for AT then both of you should just random on the same side (allies or axis). Good chances you will end up in the same game. If not, deal with it like the rest of us.
Or set up your own basic games with VPs and standard resources. I guarantee there are decent (or even better) people who will join it.
The advantages of an AT team aren't just TeamSpeak or Mumble, which are significant, it is that you have played together regularly and know each others roles in the team where randoms have to figure it out. Figuring it out is part of 2v2.
It does not need to count to leaderboards, but only as a means of finding a game.
For example, I want to play with a freind; these days it's very long wait to find a game even in basic match (if you dont want to play anihilate/high resources) and almost imposible in AT.
I would much rather have a game than insist on fair play about teams not being arragned. The players are too few these days, bring them together, dont separate them.
Also, it does not need to be prioritized. Only after certain wait you bring them into pool with other. The leaderboards itself work in a similiar manners. If you cant find a player of your level after a while it will expand the search and you can get much better/worse opponents.
27 Dec 2014, 12:14 PM
#11
4 Posts: 480 | Subs: 1
Since there won´t be another patch this discussion is hypothetical anyway.
27 Dec 2014, 14:47 PM
#12
Posts: 935
I dont care much about the ladders, but I do like to play with a friend(Both automatch or basic match)
First of all arranged teams play against random.
Secondly
f cuz you don't need rank because what you really need is the Victory all the time. That's why you play with "friend" and don't play with random mate. Everyone knows there is a higher chance to lose a game.So hell no. play and wait so you will have a decent opponents. Who would be able to kick yours asses. Very soon you will blame either the balance or your friends.
Say no to all this.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
250 | ||
|
|
|
|
46 | ||
 |
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
698 users are online:
698 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM