Login

russian armor

Ardennes Assault - USF 81mm Mortar

9 Nov 2014, 15:03 PM
#1
9 Nov 2014, 15:10 PM
#2
avatar of HappyPhace

Posts: 309

9 Nov 2014, 16:04 PM
#3
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?
9 Nov 2014, 16:08 PM
#4
avatar of VIPUKS

Posts: 431 | Subs: 1

Would love to have this unit and on mp not as doctrinal unit.
9 Nov 2014, 16:11 PM
#5
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

^^ Well, it's certanly better than the Pack Howie...I say the 81mm would be amazing in T2 (Lt post) to counter Mgs.
10 Nov 2014, 02:55 AM
#6
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?


Ironically, it is. Cavalry Riflemen, Rangers, Mortar, who wants to bet they'll have 76mm Shermans too?
10 Nov 2014, 17:55 PM
#7
avatar of Sirlami
Donator 11

Posts: 422 | Subs: 3



Ironically, it is. Cavalry Riflemen, Rangers, Mortar, who wants to bet they'll have 76mm Shermans too?
Those are already in world builder so why not :D (76mm sherman atleast)
Vaz
10 Nov 2014, 18:31 PM
#8
avatar of Vaz

Posts: 1158

Is it just me or the Ardennes Assault's USF looks more balanced and potent for multiplayer than the current USF?


Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.
10 Nov 2014, 18:38 PM
#9
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

SP only?


Yes, because AA is sp only expansion.

Its not that hard to get it people.

Single player exclusive expansion=single player exclusive units.

No rocket science, so stop asking when every new USF AA exclusive unit gets released.

Remember that even soviet guards are different in SP and MP.
10 Nov 2014, 20:20 PM
#10
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Nov 2014, 17:55 PMSirlami
Those are already in world builder so why not :D (76mm sherman atleast)


They were also in WFA's announcement trailer, but were cut in favor of the weaker 75mm for some reason.
10 Nov 2014, 20:59 PM
#11
avatar of broodwarjc

Posts: 824

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Nov 2014, 18:31 PMVaz


Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.


OKW is incomplete and to cover this they had to make certain units OP for OKW, which leads ot players complaints about OKW. It is a vicious cycle of multiplayer madness.
11 Nov 2014, 16:33 PM
#15
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

some minor cleaning lets refrain from name calling. just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you get to call them a name...

i mean out of all the things you could have said and we reverted to name calling... :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
11 Nov 2014, 16:42 PM
#16
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Nov 2014, 18:31 PMVaz


Your not alone, USF has felt incomplete since it's introduction. OKW seems so in a way also, but I haven't messed with them yet, so I don't know for sure.


That's the point...both OKW and USF lacks a few core elements which make an army an army, right now WFA cannot counter some strategies, units because of the crap faction design.

This problem is in COH 1 (Brits + PE)...I hope Relic is aware of this issue as it can lead to exploits and UP/OP balance in the future.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

640 users are online: 640 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM