Suggestions/Criticism please for this replay
23 Sep 2014, 14:49 PM
#1
Posts: 87
What should have I done better?
23 Sep 2014, 17:35 PM
#2
14
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Guys! Can somebody please assist?
23 Sep 2014, 23:22 PM
#3
Posts: 87
58 views and not a single download -.-
25 Sep 2014, 11:18 AM
#4
Posts: 7
So
You were floating lot of manpower! Why?
You went T1, ok. But why sniper came out after 5 minutes? And why you made only one while you had almost 1000 MP?
In early game your ally was fighting hard, but he was alone. Laying mines is good, but you should help him more. Later you made guards, I don't know why, they are rather weak now. Shocks are much better, there is a doc with shocks and ISU152.
Later you made even more guards. Why not snipers?
T3. You had not many CPs (because you were too defensive and you did't engage in enough battles in early game), so you could made T3. But you could do it earlier. And why you didn't made any unit from there? 3 t34 could win this game.
ISU152. Why you throw it unsupported? You were lucky that it survived.
And finally - don't play so passively! Be more agressive, do more, don't wait for your opponent reaction!
You were floating lot of manpower! Why?
You went T1, ok. But why sniper came out after 5 minutes? And why you made only one while you had almost 1000 MP?
In early game your ally was fighting hard, but he was alone. Laying mines is good, but you should help him more. Later you made guards, I don't know why, they are rather weak now. Shocks are much better, there is a doc with shocks and ISU152.
Later you made even more guards. Why not snipers?
T3. You had not many CPs (because you were too defensive and you did't engage in enough battles in early game), so you could made T3. But you could do it earlier. And why you didn't made any unit from there? 3 t34 could win this game.
ISU152. Why you throw it unsupported? You were lucky that it survived.
And finally - don't play so passively! Be more agressive, do more, don't wait for your opponent reaction!
25 Sep 2014, 15:02 PM
#5
Posts: 2819
Dude, not everyone is excited to watch your game and give comments..
25 Sep 2014, 18:00 PM
#6
Posts: 87
Dude, not everyone is excited to watch your game and give comments..
Eh, you righht.
And Rum, cheers for the advice mate
25 Sep 2014, 19:55 PM
#7
14
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Well, we got an outcome, and that is good,. Big thanks to Rum
And as an aside: to all members who are thinking of applying for staff at some point, especially as Strategy Specialists or Writers, this is the kind of thread where you get to spread your wings and contribute, so that it assists those who have to decide upon your application - they can see if you do contribute, and how effectively. Call it a practice session, if you like. It's a win-win for all, or should be.
And now to other things....
And as an aside: to all members who are thinking of applying for staff at some point, especially as Strategy Specialists or Writers, this is the kind of thread where you get to spread your wings and contribute, so that it assists those who have to decide upon your application - they can see if you do contribute, and how effectively. Call it a practice session, if you like. It's a win-win for all, or should be.
And now to other things....
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
32 | |||||
9 | |||||
205 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231