Posts: 971
Ok, nerf that fuckin' Katiusha back and the wurframen together with it. This is getting silly and out of control. Fuck both units, tone them down and reduce a little from wurframen cost, at least.
Posts: 542
Posts: 148
Posts: 1158
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
1 
Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2
I'm pretty sure the relic balance team uses the top 10 players as consultants, lol. Not that they follow their advice exactly, but there is communication.
 | Playercard of Marcus2389 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 31
Posts: 627
Because it caused most of the casualties in the war?
15 Posts: 164
I would like to point out two logical fallacies in this thread, resorting to reductio ad absurdum.
Argument no. 1 : "Katyusha is fine because it discourages blobbing" : really? So discouraging blobbing is enough to make a unit's effectiveness a holy cow above such petty considerations as cost, cooldown, area of effect, etc? Fine. I propose a 10 munitions V1 rocket for the OKW, with 2 second cooldown. It discourages blobbing, which is apparently enough to make it balanced.
I hope you see how this argument becomes ridiculous, real fast. The lesson here is even anti-blobbing units can overperform, and plus, the Katyusha has so many uses now other than an anti-blob measure.
Argument no. 2 : "Lol this is the same as Walking Stuka situation, only with reversed roles". Well, yes. Except that has no bearing on the balance of Katyusha OR Stuka whatsoever. Let's say they increased the Stuka damage to 10000 per rocket, and made each rocket area of effect ten times as it is now, and reduced its cost to 20 fuel, and a thread was made crying OP (rightly).
Then I could say "Well, you complained about the Katyusha so now you have no right to complain about the new Stuka, they BOTH overperform." Would I be right to say that? Or would you want to bash my head in with a brick?
Does, for example, complaining about Obersoldaten somehow disqualify me from defending Riflemen damage, in the same way as expressing my opinion on Stuka apparently makes all my opinions on Katyusha null and void for all eternity? Where is the limit to that?
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Another senseless whining thread. I guess it's number 88 on the axis side....
Posts: 390
Permanently Banned
Excuse me for whining. My OKW base truck got destroyed by a single barrage. Oh well, i guess thats balance. Gotta deal with it.
Posts: 1158
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
Posts: 1637
Excuse me for whining. My OKW base truck got destroyed by a single barrage. Oh well, i guess thats balance. Gotta deal with it.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
No problem. Better adapt to the new playstyle and flank it and don't place your holy truck right at the frontline.
Posts: 390
Permanently Banned
They might aswell remove the ability to move these trucks. Beware of the mighty Katyusha! Get your base buildings destroyed by a single barrage TODAY! Have fun! Dont whine, adapt!
Youre so biased, its disgusting. If thats you idea of balance, you might consider to quit posting on these forums.
Posts: 431
And you my friend should start to have an objective point of view especially according to things like balance. You are exaggerating, no Katyusha on earth destroys a truck with a single barrage.
Pics or didn't happen. Or maybe post a replay
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
And you my friend should start to have an objective point of view especially according to things like balance. You are exaggerating, no Katyusha on earth destroys a truck with a single barrage.
Pics or didn't happen. Or maybe post a replay
Posts: 390
Permanently Banned
Posts: 65
Posts: 65
Okay. How about moving your truck? Seriously, I think 13 hits is ok
 |
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
111 | ||
|
|
|
|
30 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
