Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!

Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!

PAGES (15)down
Relic
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
raw
26 Jul 2014, 08:07 AM
#161
avatar of raw

Posts: 644

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Jul 2014, 18:36 PMbC_

Long Range Combat:
With our change to lethality in a previous update to make cover more important. A side effect of that change was that it made long range weapons extremely effective, especially LMGs. The combination of cover, lethality, and long range has resulted in medium to short range units being overall less effective. In most situation, units that require closer range will lose too many men on approach resulting in a significant drop in offensive performance.

Feedback would be greatly appreciated and thank you!




It's good to see it is finally on the table. But what are your ideas solving this issue? Maybe there should be a clear differentiation along the armor value between "CQC" and "long range" troops?
5 OP OH tanks in front of your base
blow one up, slap it around
7 OP OH tanks in front of your base
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Marcus2389
26 Jul 2014, 08:10 AM
#162
avatar of Marcus2389
Developer Relic Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2

Cleaned the thread a bit, good morning.
Playercard of Marcus2389

1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: None
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P
1v1: P2v2: P3v3: P4v4: P


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Brick Top
26 Jul 2014, 09:46 AM
#163
avatar of Brick Top

Posts: 1162

Maxims: really frustrating to face many of them early game.


But we dont want to see them nerfed hard. I really like the idea of increased build time, so for example when the 1st maxim comes out early game, you go to flank it and the second one is suddenly there to shut down your flank...

This is so frustrating, a longer build time would reduce this and encourage cons more to support the maxims .

Dont forget tier structure build time and starting rss were tweaked a LOT to allow much earlier fielding of T2 units... so a build time increase would soften this effect while still keeping those builds viable.

In a mixed build like 4 cons, 2 maxims, longer build time on maxims wont have a large impact, but in 3-4 maxim builds, it will start to slow down its field presence and make flanks viable.



If there is a model reduction, maybe down to 5. I think 4 would be too harsh.

Possibly a slight MP increase of 10-20 MP to also promote not spamming them?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
26 Jul 2014, 10:28 AM
#164
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

Make so Support weapons are not able to grab territory. Maxim spam problem solved.
My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Cannonade
26 Jul 2014, 11:03 AM
#165
avatar of Cannonade

Posts: 752

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 10:28 AMOZtheWiZARD
Make so Support weapons are not able to grab territory. Maxim spam problem solved.


How is that fair to other factions support teams though?

And the Devs, specifically and in no uncertain terms, are asking for feedback on Sov Support Team durability

That is the actual question at hand.
"You are competitive if play to win and make efforts to improve." -Basilone
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
26 Jul 2014, 11:43 AM
#166
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 11:03 AMCannonade


How is that fair to other factions support teams though?

And the Devs, specifically and in no uncertain terms, are asking for feedback on Sov Support Team durability

That is the actual question at hand.


Don't understand the question. This change won't affect performance of support teams at all. This way Maxim and every other HMG can stay the same.
My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
FrikadelleXXL
26 Jul 2014, 12:00 PM
#167
avatar of FrikadelleXXL

Posts: 390

Permanently Banned
@Devs: The problem "Maxim Spam" could be easily solved if sovjets were given infantry strong enough to face Grens in an equal combat. You can't engage on melee range everytime!
http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198011483718
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Kreatiir
26 Jul 2014, 12:14 PM
#168
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 12:00 PMFrikadelleXXL
@Devs: The problem "Maxim Spam" could be easily solved if sovjets were given infantry strong enough to face Grens in an equal combat. You can't engage on melee range everytime!


There we go. +1 on that.
All posts made are about situations in 2v2's. Not a 1v1 player.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Erguvan
26 Jul 2014, 12:56 PM
#170
avatar of Erguvan

Posts: 273

Soviet Weapon Support Teams;

Zis; Yes it is durable but has low rate of fire comparing to Pak40. To deal with especially heavy tanks, it needs to be durable.

Maxim; It is not durable even having 6 men because while this unit is on retreat, men of squad drives the machine gun on its wheels. Therefore; when it is under fire on retreat, the man who drives machine gun is killed so frequently, and then machine gun drops, new man goes to grap it, machine gun is grabbed, finally, the unit starts to move to retreat. This causes the unit delay on retreat, which mean usually death.. There is no such a case for mg42. Mg42 is carried on the shoulder of a man in the squad. If he dies, the machine gun is teleported to another man, so the unit doesnt stop on retreat.

When I use maxims, I usually retreat it when it loses 2 of its men to prevent the death due to delay caused "driver man killed" on retreat.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Cannonade
26 Jul 2014, 13:31 PM
#171
avatar of Cannonade

Posts: 752

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 11:43 AMOZtheWiZARD


Don't understand the question


The question is:

Devs are asking for feedback on the problem of Soviet Support Team durability being too high.
"You are competitive if play to win and make efforts to improve." -Basilone
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
26 Jul 2014, 15:33 PM
#172
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 13:31 PMCannonade


The question is:

Devs are asking for feedback on the problem of Soviet Support Team durability being too high.



I didn't understand your statement/ question. Never mind.


Maxim is fine. ZiS and 120mm Mortar for some reason are made of titanium or something similar as they tend to take much more beating. I would change these, leaving Maxim intact.

I would change so support teams can't cap to kill two birds with one stone and resolve the issue with Maxims over performing when spammed.
My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Cannonade
26 Jul 2014, 16:08 PM
#173
avatar of Cannonade

Posts: 752

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 15:33 PMOZtheWiZARD


Maxim is fine. ZiS and 120mm Mortar for some reason are made of titanium or something similar as they tend to take much more beating. I would change these, leaving Maxim intact.

Maxim/ZiS/120mm/82mm/45mm AtG all have the same durability. All are equally "titanium".

The "titanium", is the result of two extra 80hp models as compared to all other factions.

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 15:33 PMOZtheWiZARD
I would change so support teams can't cap to kill two birds with one stone and resolve the issue with Maxims over performing when spammed.


I dont see how that addresses Sov Support Team durability, or any reason how the Support Teams of both Sov, and other factions, being unable to cap would change that.

Or are you suggesting that only Sov Support Teams be unable to cap?
"You are competitive if play to win and make efforts to improve." -Basilone
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
26 Jul 2014, 17:52 PM
#174
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

Omg. It's obvious it doesn't My comment was about something else.


On the subject:

From my experience I don't have problems with Maxims being too durable because their counters can counter them quite well.
120mm Mortar and ZiS are different because Mortar can pack itself and retreat and ZiS even when flanked can take multiple tank shells and provides green cover as well (if I am not mistaken) so clearing it with infantry takes time. That's why I came out with the idea of leaving Maxim as it is and only adjust ZiS and Mortars.

My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
FappingFrog
26 Jul 2014, 17:56 PM
#175
avatar of FappingFrog

Posts: 135

If the maxim squad does get turned to 4 man, GG because of the stupid rifles nades, that can kill up to 4 members, because they like to bunch up :(
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
CieZ
26 Jul 2014, 19:18 PM
#177
avatar of CieZ

Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4

The durability of Soviet weapon teams is largely fine especially considering that they perform worse than the Ost counterparts in pretty much every area other than durability, and the DPS of German squads.

Maxim spam is really only an issue in team games. I don't know how they could be nerfed in team games but still be useful in 1v1. Maybe try 5 men or something... or making Soviet snipers more susceptible to counter sniping so that in team games the German sniper is more viable, since he tends to hard counter t2 spam, but gets countered pretty well by t1.

Signature by dart_striker
My Stream: www.twitch.tv/ciez23
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
VanA
26 Jul 2014, 21:01 PM
#178
avatar of VanA

Posts: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 17:56 PMFappingFrog
If the maxim squad does get turned to 4 man, GG because of the stupid rifles nades, that can kill up to 4 members, because they like to bunch up :(


Axis Mg teams have 4 men, USF and Soviet have grenades also Axis' MGs are not powerfull like maxim. I mean maxim can easly suppress units. So there's no negative side of the making maxim team 4 men.

ALso every Soviet player's spamming Maxim nowadays. Especially in 1v1.
-Everybody says bait a Grenadier/Volks, flank maxim with sturmpioner / pioneer from behind. That's a cool idea but there' re more maxims that cover one maxims a**. Its shape's like this " .:. " one in the middle and two maxims cover two flanking positions, also there' re some Conscripts. I mean I could be newbie and wrong but I can see that in streams. Streamer or their opponents are doing this. Make a wall of Maxims and Conscripts while your opponents trying the break that wall build some Tanks and Katyushas.


By the way, I wrote a message here about buffing Soviet units more, well you were right I was trolling and I broke this peacefull thread. I'm respectfull man and I was sad.
--I'm sorry for acting like 5 years old kid.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Gecko2k3
26 Jul 2014, 21:02 PM
#179
avatar of Gecko2k3

Posts: 91

Maxim-Shocks-Isu on every game.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
pigsoup
26 Jul 2014, 22:05 PM
#180
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jul 2014, 17:52 PMOZtheWiZARD
...
ZiS even when flanked can take multiple tank shells and provides green cover as well (if I am not mistaken) so clearing it with infantry takes time. That's why I came out with the idea of leaving Maxim as it is and only adjust ZiS and Mortars.



doesn't the green cover face the front? and whenever i flank zis either by infantry or tank, zis seems to dies just as fast when i flank pak. may be zis gets lucky rarely and take some more time.



















Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

3v3: Pstreak: - 3
3v3: Pstreak: + 8
3v3: Pstreak: - 3
3v3: Pstreak: - 2


















Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

3v3: Pstreak: - 3
2v2: Pstreak: - 2with Ohme
2v2: Pstreak: + 1with Ohme
2v2: Pstreak: + 3with Medman






Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (15)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
3 users are browsing this thread: 3 guests
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1235
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

769 users are online: 769 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM