Pak 43
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 PM
#1
Posts: 51
since the new patch has anyone had any luck with this gun i think the range nerf has hurt it a bit to much as with the cost. i like the pop cap reduction, but cant Relic nerf things in small amounts rather than an "all or nothing aproach"
27 Jun 2014, 13:24 PM
#2
Posts: 1701
Luck? I use it all my games as Ostheer, its perfect for me, has more range than every allied tank, and if you protect it good from enemy ground units, it becomes H E L L for enemy tanks xD
27 Jun 2014, 15:05 PM
#3
Posts: 51
i meant to say success. you have any replays that i could learn from
27 Jun 2014, 15:23 PM
#4
Posts: 476
I should really test it more, but all my games are with new factions right now.
In theorie I think the range nerf might have hit the Pak43 harder then the Elephant/ISU enen though they got their range reduced to 70, while the Pak43 still has 80.
For the ISU/Elephant the Range was so good because:
It was a surprise and your units were never save when it shot from so far away. You couldn't plan a attack on it when it was so far away AND could repostion.
The Pak43 has the surprise effect only ONE time, the ISU can reposition.
And the worst part: 80 range reduces the Area you can cover with it, absolutly independent of how hard it is to kill. Maybe its not enough range to cover 2 VPs now?
And is the Immobile pak43 with only 33% more range better than the mobile Pak40?
But as I said, I have to test it more.
In theorie I think the range nerf might have hit the Pak43 harder then the Elephant/ISU enen though they got their range reduced to 70, while the Pak43 still has 80.
For the ISU/Elephant the Range was so good because:
It was a surprise and your units were never save when it shot from so far away. You couldn't plan a attack on it when it was so far away AND could repostion.
The Pak43 has the surprise effect only ONE time, the ISU can reposition.
And the worst part: 80 range reduces the Area you can cover with it, absolutly independent of how hard it is to kill. Maybe its not enough range to cover 2 VPs now?
And is the Immobile pak43 with only 33% more range better than the mobile Pak40?
But as I said, I have to test it more.
27 Jun 2014, 15:33 PM
#5
Posts: 934
Yeah I agree with what Lichtbringer stated. The issue with the pak43 now against USF is it highly susceptible to being destroyed. This is as a result of the Major off-map strike having a large cast range and extremely hard hitting.
Joint Operations will be a difficult doctrine to use against USF I feel.
Joint Operations will be a difficult doctrine to use against USF I feel.
27 Jun 2014, 17:13 PM
#6
Posts: 51
I have been trying to use it and have been having a hard time. If any of you pros, use joint ops would you mind posting the replay so i could study some of your moves thanks
27 Jun 2014, 17:28 PM
#7
Posts: 934
Well Joint Operations is my staple Whermacht doctrine. I lterally use it for half my games. I'd be super cautious of using it against America. If I do get a replay though I'll be sure to post it.
27 Jun 2014, 20:27 PM
#8
Posts: 51
Thanks man I appreciate it.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
51 | |||||
30 | |||||
9 | |||||
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.1103405.731+8
- 3.845.944+25
- 4.842223.791+5
- 5.943411.696-1
- 6.35759.858+3
- 7.275145.655+1
- 8.280108.722+31
- 9.307114.729+3
- 10.10629.785+7
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
12
Download
1270
Board Info
473 users are online:
473 guests
1 post in the last 24h
18 posts in the last week
49 posts in the last month
18 posts in the last week
49 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50278
Welcome our newest member, Stirfvfcdk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Stirfvfcdk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM