Fury (2014)
27 Jun 2014, 01:30 AM
#21
Posts: 1571
The tank combat shown looks very bogus, as for the 'Germans'(rein-actors).
27 Jun 2014, 10:44 AM
#22
Posts: 419
Afaik the movie was partly funded by World of tanks game company and will have a focus on that gameplay.
27 Jun 2014, 10:59 AM
#23
Posts: 747
The film is set during the last months of World War II in April 1945. As the Allies make their final push in the European Theater, a battle-hardened U.S. Army sergeant in the 2nd Armored Division named Wardaddy (Brad Pitt) commands a Sherman tank called "Fury" and its five-man crew on a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Outnumbered and outgunned, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds in their heroic attempts to strike at the heart of Nazi Germany.
Plot summarized on wikipedia
Sounds like a very cheesy "
amisMurica f*ck yeah- Movieamis" to me!
Plot summarized on wikipedia
Sounds like a very cheesy "
amisMurica f*ck yeah- Movieamis" to me!
27 Jun 2014, 12:18 PM
#24
Posts: 419
Its not heroic to continue beating an enemy, who is already on the ground.
27 Jun 2014, 15:16 PM
#25
Posts: 403
Its not heroic to continue beating an enemy, who is already on the ground.
But, they are outnumbered, so who cares about the rest of the war, which is already won, those characters, are in danger, so OMG, tension.
27 Jun 2014, 19:55 PM
#26
Posts: 431
Outnumbered in April 1945? I smell Volkssturm-spam.
27 Jun 2014, 21:29 PM
#27
4 
Posts: 951
It was filmed in the UK, the Tiger Tank is real, I like the cast and director and love war movies.
I am really looking forward to the movie.
I am really looking forward to the movie.
27 Jun 2014, 23:14 PM
#28
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
looks exciting, problem is they're going to fuck it up by either
-include unnecessary females roles because of femminazi's and 'muh generic heroine female roles'(see : stalingrad 2013, all modern Disney films, etc etc etc)
I love how somehow Disney movies, which have been about princesses for literally forever, have "unnecessary female roles." You must really hate women!
Signature by Ginnungagap
28 Jun 2014, 10:09 AM
#29
Posts: 403
Outnumbered in April 1945? I smell Volkssturm-spam.
Pfffft, try coh 1 volks mp40 spam, fucking kch motherfuckers right there.
28 Jun 2014, 20:57 PM
#30
Posts: 220
Good post Ami, I wasn't aware of this movie.
Looks like your typical WW2 action move. Combat won't be very authentic compared to masterpieces such as Cross of Iron but it will still be enjoyable.
And the use of real WW2 tanks is a major bonus. Anyhow I love seeing nazis get pummeled by good old cigar munching chaps, even if it's cliché.
Will definitely watch and enjoy it.
Looks like your typical WW2 action move. Combat won't be very authentic compared to masterpieces such as Cross of Iron but it will still be enjoyable.
And the use of real WW2 tanks is a major bonus. Anyhow I love seeing nazis get pummeled by good old cigar munching chaps, even if it's cliché.
Will definitely watch and enjoy it.
"Apprécier les circonstances dans chaque cas particulier, tel est donc le rôle essentiel du chef. Du fait qu'il les connaît, qu'il les mesure, qu'il les exploite, il est vainqueur ; du fait qu'il les ignore, qu'il les juge mal, qu'il les néglige, il est vaincu."
Le Fil de l'épée, Charles de Gaulle.
Le Fil de l'épée, Charles de Gaulle.
1 Jul 2014, 05:23 AM
#31
7 
Posts: 1664
Yo Shane from Walking Dead is in it? I'm in.
He was also in The Pacific so he's already done the WWII thang.
1 Jul 2014, 09:22 AM
#32
Posts: 368
btw. if anybody wants to see this kitty in a movie,
watch "La neige et le feu"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102520/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
there is a Panther tank and shermans too, ofc all real, since Saumur tank museum donated them for the movie.
Anywhere i can see this movie?
1 Jul 2014, 13:43 PM
#33
Posts: 184
I love how somehow Disney movies, which have been about princesses for literally forever, have "unnecessary female roles." You must really hate women!
I believe he's talking about placing women in an historical context that they never actually occupied.
1 Jul 2014, 14:10 PM
#34
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
I didn't realize the Disney movies were so historically accurate with the exception of the women. This changes my view entirely of the role that lion kings have played in the history of Africa.
Signature by Ginnungagap
5 Jul 2014, 18:04 PM
#35
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
5 Jul 2014, 18:13 PM
#36
Posts: 419
Coincidence?
5 Jul 2014, 18:28 PM
#37
Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2
Company of Heroes didn't invent people sitting on tanks...
http://ww2db.com/images/vehicle_crusader5.jpg
http://ww2db.com/images/vehicle_panzervi132.jpg
http://ww2db.com/images/vehicle_crusader5.jpg
http://ww2db.com/images/vehicle_panzervi132.jpg
Signature by Ginnungagap
5 Jul 2014, 21:07 PM
#38
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Speaking of sitting on tanks... wasn't there gonna be inf riding tanks in WFA? I thought I heard something about that.
6 Jul 2014, 01:53 AM
#39
Posts: 2561
Speaking of sitting on tanks... wasn't there gonna be inf riding tanks in WFA? I thought I heard something about that.It got cut. When I hopped into alpha you could garrison soviet tanks, but the animation didn't quite work. Might see it later on though.
13 Jul 2014, 00:56 AM
#40
Posts: 978
Definitely watching it for the tanks. I remember watching "A Bridge too far" and wondering what German WW2 tank those Leopard I were supposed to represent. This was awkward.
Still I can´t help the feeling that the movie is going to have some frustrating stereotype shit in it.
The Tiger will of course lose to the Sherman. Choose one of the following:
1) The Germans get cocky and do something stupid.
2) Brad Pitt does a sacrifice to kill himself and the Tiger.
3) Brad Pitt has a super intelligent plan that would never work, but does work.
4) The Sherman just breaks the law of physics and destroys the Tiger without problems.
In "Saving Private Ryan" - also directed by Spielberg - socks were sufficient to get rid of one of the Tigers.
Either way... the Tiger won´t make it out alive in that movie.
Still I can´t help the feeling that the movie is going to have some frustrating stereotype shit in it.
The Tiger will of course lose to the Sherman. Choose one of the following:
1) The Germans get cocky and do something stupid.
2) Brad Pitt does a sacrifice to kill himself and the Tiger.
3) Brad Pitt has a super intelligent plan that would never work, but does work.
4) The Sherman just breaks the law of physics and destroys the Tiger without problems.
In "Saving Private Ryan" - also directed by Spielberg - socks were sufficient to get rid of one of the Tigers.
Either way... the Tiger won´t make it out alive in that movie.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
891 users are online:
891 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49101
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM