Sounds like the main issue is radio intercept. We will look into it.Yeah building and unit information is probably enough. No need for defensive structure info as well.
Soviets Advanced Warfare Tactics Commander
1 Mar 2014, 07:00 AM
#61
Posts: 2561
1 Mar 2014, 07:40 AM
#62
Posts: 1702
yay,lets nerf armored assault and NKVD even more,i mean hardly anyone uses those commanders anyway.
1 Mar 2014, 07:50 AM
#63
4 
Posts: 813 | Subs: 1
yay,lets nerf armored assault and NKVD even more,i mean hardly anyone uses those commanders anyway.
Since few are using it anyway, exchanging some of the abilities couldn't hurt.
1 Mar 2014, 08:01 AM
#64
2 
Posts: 1108
Yeah building and unit information is probably enough. No need for defensive structure info as well.
+1
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Mar 2014, 08:43 AM
#65
Posts: 210
nothing wrong with this commander, just a well rounded commander which is rare with the soviets. radio intercept is seem fine, no one complained about it before this commander but maybe location of mines and bunker should be removed seem a bit silly
1 Mar 2014, 08:52 AM
#66
Posts: 301
Yeah building and unit information is probably enough. No need for defensive structure info as well.
Okay, let them rename the ability to "Radio Half-Intercept".
1 Mar 2014, 10:34 AM
#67
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Since few are using it anyway, exchanging some of the abilities couldn't hurt.
Put guards instead, in all of them and there! NKVD have something appealiong suddenly(guards+prop arty), AA have early game presence and guards match advanced warfare anyway
and german whiners don't have to deal with "op information about what they have built" everyone happy!Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 Mar 2014, 10:35 AM
#68
Posts: 187
Actually i think the main thing that has come from this post, is that this is the most polished commander currently available and that the others need to have some abilities changed. Then their abilities may complement each other better giving us more choice. Be nice to have commanders fit play-styles better than have one the the top pick of the bunch.
1 Mar 2014, 11:11 AM
#69
Posts: 1702
i guess the radio intercept could not show the location of enemy mines,however it must show buildings/ what stuff is made. Or maybe just say mines built,but not the location.
1 Mar 2014, 11:55 AM
#70
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Or maybe just say mines built,but not the location.
This AND
Actually i think the main thing that has come from this post, is that this is the most polished commander currently available and that the others need to have some abilities changed. Then their abilities may complement each other better giving us more choice. Be nice to have commanders fit play-styles better than have one the the top pick of the bunch.
+1
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
1 Mar 2014, 12:39 PM
#71
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Radio Intercept also was fine in vCOH. I think the main balance issue right now is the Sniper problem.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
1 Mar 2014, 12:41 PM
#72
Posts: 2779
Saying radio is fine is like saying maphack is fine 
1 Mar 2014, 12:53 PM
#73
Posts: 210
vasvhjasmhnsansbmasnbkas/,bmas kjbasdasdvbjhasdjbkasdbkjlasd;l aslkjbdkjasdkjadjkhavdjh crout propaganda avdjhavdjh absdihaphdoadhadikavdinasd'iado jasbdkj
Lols
Lols
1 Mar 2014, 13:43 PM
#74
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Saying radio is fine is like saying maphack is fine
I see no one complaining about the maphack ability in the Partisans doctrine.
Radio is far from being a maphack as it just briefly tells you what has been built. The G43 interrogation is harder to pull off, i agree with that, but it gives you much more info. I'd be excited to see the reactions if Relic implemented radio trangulation for soviets. Another thing that was fine in vCOH.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
1 Mar 2014, 14:19 PM
#75
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Saying radio is fine is like saying maphack is fine
Saying radio intercept is a map hack is like saying SU-76 is a tank hunter.
You want to see maphack? Try interrogation.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 Mar 2014, 16:50 PM
#76
Posts: 2779
Saying radio intercept is a map hack is like saying SU-76 is a tank hunter.
You want to see maphack? Try interrogation.
That thing is not working like beta before. I know it's maphack, but it is now too hard to find injured cons around for your G43 to activate maphack, more important it is not always the timing you need the intel.
Radio, is lol, all game long.
1 Mar 2014, 21:33 PM
#77
2 Posts: 101
Radio intercept would be fine If,
-It doesn't notify where bunkers and mines have been built(I'm ok with fuel and munitions cache notification)
-It comes in at 1cp
-It doesn't notify where bunkers and mines have been built(I'm ok with fuel and munitions cache notification)
-It comes in at 1cp
2 Mar 2014, 07:39 AM
#78
7 
Posts: 1664
I agree that revealing the specific locations of mines and defensive structures is not necessary for Radio Intercept but if it's moved to 1 CP you might as well remove it from the game.
2 Mar 2014, 08:09 AM
#79
Posts: 301
I think devs should disable all units for soviets except the conscripts. This would be a great balance.
2 Mar 2014, 09:31 AM
#80
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I think devs should disable all units for soviets except the conscripts. This would be a great balance.
Conscripts have oorah.
Last time I've read german players posts, oorah is something between soviet nuclear arsenal and homing meteor strike when we talk power, so conscripts obviously would be much more then needed to win. I propose CEs, but we need to take upgrades out, they are OP because they can instakill ubermensch model.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
1010 users are online:
1010 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49102
Welcome our newest member, Rusel334
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Rusel334
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM