RNG has been discussed extensively on this forum since day one. The spontaneous combustion of flamer wielding units is still my number one RNG grudge. I know the chance already got reduced to 10% (or something) but it still happens "way too often". I've been using flamer pios every game in this patch and this post is mostly directed to performance of flamer pioneers. I really like to use them, but it seems like the game doesn't want me to.
The thing is, flamer is a major munitions investment especially for Ostheer. The fact that there is a chance that your heavy early game investment can be lost in the first engagement is outrageous. This has happened to me multiple times and sometimes it can totally turn the tide. I've even had it happen on the first shot on the pio squad.
I suggest that the flamer explosion effect may only happen when the last entity of the squad is killed. This would have multiple benefits:
- It makes flamer units more reliable assault units.
- Flamer units more effectively counter heavily armored infantry units. As they should.
- Reduces the amount of game changing RNG events.
- Rewards micro and unit preservation instead of luck.
Exploding flamers
18 Dec 2013, 09:13 AM
#1
Posts: 249
18 Dec 2013, 10:33 AM
#2
Posts: 271
Yes please
18 Dec 2013, 10:45 AM
#3
Posts: 1003
Pio spam 2.0 ? :-)
18 Dec 2013, 10:52 AM
#4
Posts: 249
I don't think piospam would be that much more viable with this change. In my opinion you have more tools in your hands to counter piospam in coh2 than you do in vcoh.
18 Dec 2013, 11:37 AM
#5
Posts: 1003
I don't think piospam would be that much more viable with this change. In my opinion you have more tools in your hands to counter piospam in coh2 than you do in vcoh.
Piospam was fun. :-)
Engineers need reciving expirience from mines.
18 Dec 2013, 14:15 PM
#6
Posts: 971
Strangely, the flamers that my penals have never explode.
Why the ones the engineers use are so unreliable?
Why the ones the engineers use are so unreliable?
18 Dec 2013, 17:35 PM
#7
3
Posts: 368
Was reduced from 10% to 5% iirc.
It would be preferable imho, if the explosion was tied to drops instead (perhaps increase the droprate to 300%, but make it explode 2/3 times when this drop happens).
It is indeed annoyingly silly, though the reduction was nice.
It would be preferable imho, if the explosion was tied to drops instead (perhaps increase the droprate to 300%, but make it explode 2/3 times when this drop happens).
It is indeed annoyingly silly, though the reduction was nice.
19 Dec 2013, 00:34 AM
#8
Posts: 409
+1
The RNG aspect makes minesweepers > flamer on pioneers any day.
The RNG aspect makes minesweepers > flamer on pioneers any day.
19 Dec 2013, 02:40 AM
#9
Posts: 419
Man, I built 2 flamer pios out of my last 20 games and they lasted 1 or 2 shots and boom. Which I rarely see on penals but 90 percent on pios.
19 Dec 2013, 02:42 AM
#10
Posts: 419
M3s, shock troops, and t70s I think would make pio spam impossible anyway.
Piospam was fun. :-)
Engineers need receiving experience from mines.
22 Dec 2013, 09:52 AM
#11
Posts: 19
You do know that flame gear was insanely dangerous during the war, right. Accidents were fairly common.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
19 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
1015 users are online:
1015 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49080
Welcome our newest member, Keensler
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Keensler
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM