The most disappointing tank is the tiger

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 15:34 PMPip

Not certain why you consider disagreement some sort of mortal sin.

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 18:17 PMelchino7

If i want one thing out of any "rework" or new balance pass on heavies, is to remove the extended range at vet2 and give them strengths/buffs in other areas as needed.

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 19:03 PMPip

Is with the intention of standardising Heavy range at 40, 45, or keeping them at their current state of either being 40/45 and simply not improving from there at veterancy?

I'm assuming it's all these vehicles making it to 50 range that's your issue? If so, that's understandable. I expect there would be room to make Heavies a little less underwhelming if this was changed.

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 19:12 PMelchino7

Because i feel it's day and night when the Tiger and IS2 manage to get vet2. It also makes their counters less effective, specially for OH vs IS2 when their stock vehicle options are either the Stug/Panther, both units with the same range.
Improve/make them good at what they already are. Not reduce the effectiveness of their counters.

This is one of the things i disliked since 2013. Maybe some day. In the same way i thought that one of the only things that PG needed to be relevant was changing their vet1 to RA. A man can dream.

Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 19:21 PMPip

This is fair, and If I'm honest I think I'm inclined to agree. The specific OST comparison is interesting, and it isnt something I'd previously considered.

Got any specific ideas in mind, or is this more a case of "General sentiment"?

What even is the role that "Heavy" tanks are even meant to fill, anyway? I've never been 100% sure. "Premium premium medium"?