Posts: 282
Except that the T-shirt and house analogy is completely hysterical, as are you for buying into it. The buffs were all around 10-20% of one single stat for most units. Everybody got a T-shirt except for the Tommies, who got a 0.15% and a 0.05% T-shirt. Nobody got or lost a house.
 | Playercard of [DGM] Cain Le Roi Du Pétrole | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Fix commanders making the game imbalanced. I shouldn't have to pick a certain commander to counter a certain other one. Like why don't we fix this?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
Except that the T-shirt and house analogy is completely hysterical, as are you for buying into it. The buffs were all around 10-20% of one single stat for most units. Everybody got a T-shirt except for the Tommies, who got a 0.15% and a 0.05% T-shirt. Nobody got or lost a house.
Posts: 1954
I think you are really missing the point here.
Let me use a simple example.
Lets buff Kubel speed 100%
Kubel OP (of course) but... is OKW OP because of that?
Clearly BS.
1v1 matchup only. Skill dependent assumption. Small sample. Missing combinations. Not a single in depth description of each game.
Let's not spread sh*t please
Posts: 1954
Except that it's not 0.05%. It's a 50% improvement in RA because we're comparing the previous -10% RA with the current -15% RA. If a unit has 0.1 of a particular stat, and you give it another 0.05, it's not a 0.05% improvement. It's 150% of what it previously was. It's a huge performance improvement relative to the previous iteration of Tommies
And the moving accuracy buff is a 42.8% increase in moving DPS, not 0.15%. Your numbers are off by about 28,500 %.
Tommies have indeed been overtuned but not to the point where they're uncounterable. They used to be great in cover and bad when moving or out of cover. Now they're great in cover and still better than Volks/Grens when moving or out of cover, which is pretty oppressive given how early bolster comes online.
Posts: 306
You do have a somewhat valid point on the moving accuracy, it is a larger increase if you use the previous moving accuracy as the divisor. By your own math, you're wrong on the RA. You could call it a 5.9% buff, so you only missed it by 144.1%. (or since it was really a 5.9% buff, you exaggerated it by roughly 2440%)
Posts: 309
Posts: 2358
So you and others turn a couple small percentage buffs into a huge balance issue, somehow needing a hotfix that Miragefla allegedly had ready to go (if true, would really like to see him explain himself), declared UKF more or less unbeatable before the tournament, and even had people calling the balance team incompetent and demanding they quit.
Yes, let's not spread shit please.
Posts: 1954
I see you like double standards and got cant face it. People here told you how insignificant some ost buffs are and how relevant the IS actually is. But your spooky math is both wrong and inconsistent.
Percentage information is worthless without background.
IS having -15 % RA instead of -10 RA means 50% increase. Compared with the absolute value means (90-85)/90 = 5.556 % more durability.
It's both a 50% buff AND 5.556 % extra durability.
Posts: 2358
1) I don't like double standards, and you're anything but an unbiased judge in this.
2) No, it's not a 50% buff. You clearly don't understand how math works or don't understand the difference between multiplication and subtraction. Going from a RA of 0.9 to 0.85 is not a 50% buff. By your retarded logic, if the old RA was 0.99 and the new one was 0.98, you would be screaming that UKF got a 100% buff. It's completely idiotic.
Posts: 5279
Posts: 177
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
246 | ||
 |
|
|
86 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
