Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Can you CP lock a buildable unit? If not, that's one explanation.
Posts: 785
Can you CP lock a buildable unit? If not, that's one explanation.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
The problem is complex for a number of reason:
1) Commanders
Suggestion: one has to balance commanders so that if they have a good ability like a Super heavy tank the rest of their abilities should be UP so that the total power level of all commander abilities could be brought to about the same power level.
2) Timing
Their timing is simply too early since the arrive slightly later than mediums tank while completely nullifying them.
Suggestion:
Delay arrival. That can be achieved by:
Increasing the CP and adjusting passive CP gain in bigger MOD so that all doctrinal abilities become available around the same time.
Add a research "tech" similar to BP for them (requiring resources or not) with a long research timer acting more as delay than an actual tech restriction. The same "tech" could be used to delay the replacement of the unit once it was lost so that player would need to research it again.
Posts: 4474
guess why, I give u an hint, they did not came with the factions
Somehow missed that entire page so I didn't see this post. Couldn't agree more with this idea. I think cmrds like lightning war, Heavy Cav, Shock Rifle etc. are too loaded with good abilities
Katitof-2018
Posts: 1217
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
guess why, I give u an hint, they did not came with the factions
Posts: 3053
Not going to read 5 pages of text, so I don't know whether it has been brought up.
But let's not forget that Osth is dependant on the Tiger crutch to even be able to compete lategame. A heavy nerf would have to be combined with a T4 buff for Ost.
In general I feel like allied heavies are way more survivable than the German ones. That is due to allied heavies having more rear armor through the bank and allied tds having more pen. This issue shouldn't be ignored.
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Heavy cav was ways picked after its introduction, I don't remember a tournament without it
Posts: 1217
Panzer IV shots bouncing while flanking IS-2s, KVs, ISUs or Churchills is a common thing.
Ah yes the incredibly OP heavy rear armor.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Panzer IV shots bouncing while flanking IS-2s, KVs, ISUs or Churchills is a common thing.
Posts: 1484
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2358
No matter what the balance team do for heavy tanks nobody will be satisfied. At first, the heavy tanks came in very late due to high CP requirements which impacted 1 v 1 and 2 v 2 players. Then we changed the CP requirement again and now they come super early along with fast tech.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Panzer IV shots bouncing while flanking IS-2s, KVs, ISUs or Churchills is a common thing.
Agree, that should have been patched a while ago. Not sure why some Allied heavies still have such high rear armour values. But I guess it wasn't considered important enough to warrant attention.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
The IS-2 has 140 rear armor;
The KV-2 has 120 rear armor;
The Pershing has 110 rear armor;
The Churchills all have 180 rear armor.
The Tiger I has 140 rear armor;
The Tiger II has 150 rear armor.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
The KV2 has 180 rear armour too, not sure why you wrote 120. Was it nerfed recently?
You also forgot the KV1 at 165 which is also pretty high and KV8 at 145.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Agree, that should have been patched a while ago. Not sure why some Allied heavies still have such high rear armour values. But I guess it wasn't considered important enough to warrant attention.
Posts: 3053
Panzer IV shots bouncing while flanking IS-2s, KVs, ISUs or Churchills is a common thing.
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Panzer IV shots bouncing while flanking IS-2s, KVs, ISUs or Churchills is a common thing.
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
927 | ||
|
|
|
|
45 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
