wehr needs to have mg42 adjusted for the quality of their mainline or pzgrens need to be adjusted they can't have both
Why? Because a rank 1000 guy says so?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
wehr needs to have mg42 adjusted for the quality of their mainline or pzgrens need to be adjusted they can't have both
Posts: 281
Why? Because a rank 1000 guy says so?
Posts: 281
Posts: 888
Why? Because a rank 1000 guy says so?
Posts: 960
The MG42 is the single most "broken" OP b.s. in this game. Absolutely unbelievable that's only a 260 MP T0 unit with that kind of preformance and stats. It's eve more over kill when combined with Grenadiers, mortars, and doctrinal Assault Grens.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
It's actually a really balanced unit. It does do a ton of suppression, but that's basically it (except AP vs. LVs) - and it needs to do that suppression since Grens are basically worthless at close range. It terms DPS, especially against units in green cover or garrisons is basically non-existent. There's a reason it hasn't been adjusted in years (march 2017 was the last change).
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
It's light vehicle deletion ability still being strictly better than the .50 cal or DsHK bugs me, given those two are more expensive. I get that it needs vet, but it still seems out of line.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
It's light vehicle deletion ability still being strictly better than the .50 cal or DsHK bugs me, given those two are more expensive. I get that it needs vet, but it still seems out of line.
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Ostheer has to deal with T70, Stuart, AEC. What light vehicle do Ostheer’s opponents have to face? The mighty 222?
The reason the mg42 is better at fighting off LVs is that it compensates for Ostheer’s nonexistent LV play.
Posts: 129
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 1527
Permanently Banned
The MG42 is the single most "broken" OP b.s. in this game. Absolutely unbelievable that's only a 260 MP T0 unit with that kind of preformance and stats. It's eve more over kill when combined with Grenadiers, mortars, and doctrinal Assault Grens.
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
It's light vehicle deletion ability still being strictly better than the .50 cal or DsHK bugs me, given those two are more expensive. I get that it needs vet, but it still seems out of line.
Posts: 810
It seems out of line for you, an allied only player who doesn't have a rank for axis. The fact is that the 50cal is a straight up better MG than the 42 in all other aspects, better damage, shorter bursts than 42 = faster suppression, faster setup & packup means u can use it a lot easier offensively which is what the USF is known for, while 42 is clumsy as shit and the larger arc can't make up for it until vet 2. So you're concerned that the 50cal isn't completely dominant over the 42? And dshk is just 50cal on steroids. And you forgot that Ostheer design makes 42 underpriced because grens are overpriced. 7 man cons > lmg grens. Riflemen stomp grens for only 17% more cost especially with the recent buff to rifles.
So why don't u play some Ostheer cuz all I see from u are axis op or allied up posts.
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
you also dont play allies : )
Why don't you play some allies?
Posts: 810
Look at my playercard again and report back to me. And heck, why don't u post your playercard?
Posts: 919
Please fix Stug TWP. I never thought there would be a more pathetic ability than RE volley fire, but Stug TWP might be it.
Posts: 732
Posts: 888
It's actually a really balanced unit. It does do a ton of suppression, but that's basically it (except AP vs. LVs) - and it needs to do that suppression since Grens are basically worthless at close range. It terms DPS, especially against units in green cover or garrisons is basically non-existent. There's a reason it hasn't been adjusted in years (march 2017 was the last change).
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Ostheer has to deal with T70, Stuart, AEC. What light vehicle do Ostheer’s opponents have to face? The mighty 222?
The reason the mg42 is better at fighting off LVs is that it compensates for Ostheer’s nonexistent LV play.