I hate this map so hard as soveit+ usa vs 2 okw in early....
What a game. OKW pushed very hard and camped every house.
2 Vps for allies vs over 300 Vps for Axis.
Can allies turn the game and hold 2 Vps vs 300?
One of my exciting 2vs2 games ever.
GGWP
What a game
by
Sturmpanther
19th May 2016, 15:48 PM
- [00:33:56] TNT:
- [00:34:01] TNT:
- [00:46:33] TNT:
- [00:46:35] TNT:
- [00:58:15] TNT:
- [00:58:21] SoE-Sturmpanther-:
- [00:58:26] Stug88mm:
- [01:00:53] Stug88mm:
- [01:00:57] Stug88mm:
19 May 2016, 15:48 PM
#1
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
19 May 2016, 16:34 PM
#2
19 
Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
this map was never designed for 2v2 and should be removed from 2v2 automatch immediately, along with any other map that wasnt originally designed for 2v2.
It infuriates me that the 2v2 map pool is still this way.
It infuriates me that the 2v2 map pool is still this way.
19 May 2016, 16:52 PM
#3
Posts: 732
this map was never designed for 2v2 and should be removed from 2v2 automatch immediately, along with any other map that wasnt originally designed for 2v2.
It infuriates me that the 2v2 map pool is still this way.
cant relic just hire you already?
19 May 2016, 19:09 PM
#4
Posts: 1550 | Subs: 7
this map was never designed for 2v2 and should be removed from 2v2 automatch immediately, along with any other map that wasnt originally designed for 2v2.
It infuriates me that the 2v2 map pool is still this way.
Agreed. It has no place in the 2v2 pool.
19 May 2016, 19:22 PM
#5
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
that map is awesome in 2v2
kick that mudnest chateau thingy instead
kick that mudnest chateau thingy instead
19 May 2016, 23:16 PM
#6
19 Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
there are MANY maps that are in 2v2 ladder that shouldent be there. this is just ONE of many
20 May 2016, 21:26 PM
#7
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
there are MANY maps that are in 2v2 ladder that shouldent be there. this is just ONE of many
+1
21 May 2016, 01:58 AM
#8
Posts: 1122
I find this map risicolous to play in 1v1 aswell.
21 May 2016, 15:03 PM
#9
Posts: 1554 | Subs: 7
this map was never designed for 2v2 and should be removed from 2v2 automatch immediately, along with any other map that wasnt originally designed for 2v2.
It infuriates me that the 2v2 map pool is still this way.
there are MANY maps that are in 2v2 ladder that shouldent be there. this is just ONE of many
+1
I wish community guys like you managed the 2vs2 map pool. It makes zero sense to transfer 1vs1 maps to the 2vs2 map pool. What I also dislike is the fact that you can start at two possible slots in 1vs1 maps which are 2vs2 maps either being able to spawn in absolutely awful spots like Kharkov North-West.
No offense but Relic seems to be very incompetent when it comes to maps and their design in CoH2.
"Nullum magnum ingenium sine mixtura dementiae fuit." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca
21 May 2016, 17:59 PM
#10
19 Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
+1
I wish community guys like you managed the 2vs2 map pool. It makes zero sense to transfer 1vs1 maps to the 2vs2 map pool. What I also dislike is the fact that you can start at two possible slots in 1vs1 maps which are 2vs2 maps either being able to spawn in absolutely awful spots like Kharkov North-West.
No offense but Relic seems to be very incompetent when it comes to maps and their design in CoH2.
+1, although relic has had a few really solid maps in the past. but in general.....agreed. theyve needed a ladder mapper forever.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
940 users are online:
940 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49072
Welcome our newest member, Durddcdy23
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Durddcdy23
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM