Can Axis turn the game

Upload replay

New Reply

Ice Cream!

[c.B] Lionel23

Degnos

oldmanshootman

SoE-Sturmpanther-

WeißSchnee

Yope

Kell of Kells

No chat in this replay.

Honor it

Show Chat

Patch: 3.0.0.21040
Duration: 00:33:30

Posts: 33

Against good players .. rank 27, 3, 90, 90

Posts: 223

90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.

Posts: 68

27 Mar 2016, 06:25 AMLoxley

90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.

hi chinese guy,can you stop your words to make the people hate the chinese,plz?

Posts: 223

Why hate ? After 10 games in 4on4, your team will be between rank 5-60, it depends vs which teams you won. You have to lose many games, to be on position 90 only. Ok, in 4on4 random it takes more time than 10 games, to reach it. I admit, as allies, even rank 90 players can handle op stuff to win vs good axis teams, so, good performance with that win.

Posts: 959

27 Mar 2016, 11:15 AMLoxley

Why hate ? After 10 games in 4on4, your team will be between rank 5-60, it depends vs which teams you won. You have to lose many games, to be on position 90 only. Ok, in 4on4 random it takes more time than 10 games, to reach it. I admit, as allies, even rank 90 players can handle op stuff to win vs good axis teams, so, good performance with that win.

hey loxely how about you stfu when you don't understand that those two were rank 90 AT (2v2) and it is different with 4v4. keep quiet and stfu when you don't understand how it works. 2v2 AT rank 90 is different with what you described or think.

Ok so I can see in your playercard that your 2v2 AT with (◣╬◢) PzDiv Viper ✠ rank is 117!

https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/viewBoard/2/steamid/76561198010254130

so according to you, and considering that they were rank 90, and you are rank 117, then they are still better than you!

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

27 Mar 2016, 06:25 AMLoxley

90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.

As aladin allready wrote

I agree rank 90 in 4vs4 AT is not very well (you get it with 8/2 btw). But rank 90 in 2vs2 AT is much harder to hold; especially with 2 randoms mates in 4vs4)
Did you watched it, before you wrote soemthing? The 2vs2 AT rank 90 were both forest and won vs the 2 OKW players.

Both USA, rank 3 and 27 were city vs 2 Ostheer.

Allies on liene Forest

Posts: 223

When the game was balanced (before brits), it was no big deal. I played 2on2 with BigZ long time ago as allies, after 10 games rank 90 too, then we never played again. But I know, you write always they are good enemies, when you won. And when we win, it was axis map or enemy was bad or 1 of them was drunken or something.

Posts: 959

28 Mar 2016, 06:41 AMLoxley

When the game was balanced (before brits)

lol Can you find only one more person in the community who thinks like you and doesn't think axis was OP as fuck in 4v4 before Brits? game was balanced?! lol I am considering using this sentence as my signature lol