What a game!!!
Fucking long game. Tanks, arty, Inf.
Allies Rag 2 with 38/0 vs Randoms: 118, 5, 230, and 87 ( after they won vs rank2. So they got a lot of positions)
Allies Top side ( North) and axis bottom side ( South)
p.s. Aguany pls use your manpower; you had 1000-2000 manpower the whole game^^
gg
=★= vs Randoms
by
Sturmpanther
21st December 2015, 20:42 PM
No chat in this replay.
21 Dec 2015, 20:42 PM
#1
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
21 Dec 2015, 20:49 PM
#2
Posts: 162
Well, thanks for the "wp"
21 Dec 2015, 20:55 PM
#3
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Guess you are talking about brits and soveits?.
Well ISu is rightside horrible. And then you had no 120 mm.
Brits; well this avre did his job lol^^. One tiem he killed everything. But its too risky to use this unit.
Well ISu is rightside horrible. And then you had no 120 mm.
Brits; well this avre did his job lol^^. One tiem he killed everything. But its too risky to use this unit.
21 Dec 2015, 21:06 PM
#4
Posts: 658
incridible, gj b o i s
21 Dec 2015, 21:18 PM
#5
Posts: 162
Correct SP. Well, maybe commander choice wasnt the problem. But the mistake was certainly to not go for the baserape.
22 Dec 2015, 12:28 PM
#6
Posts: 959
I also think commander choices could have been better. imo the Royal Engineering is more an early/mid game commander for emplacement play to lock down a sector which can work sometimes very well, but sadly there were no emplacement play this game and AEC upgrade instead of bofors. Two commets and tac support arty could have ended the game with a big push
gg anyways
PS. this map is unbalanced favoring north side btw imo with the very strong position u get in north side's fuel with those houses, but I still like to veto this as allies, cause the OKW blob and KT makes it very hard to counter, also in ur case of double USF, I think p47 could have been better imo.
gg anyways
PS. this map is unbalanced favoring north side btw imo with the very strong position u get in north side's fuel with those houses, but I still like to veto this as allies, cause the OKW blob and KT makes it very hard to counter, also in ur case of double USF, I think p47 could have been better imo.
22 Dec 2015, 15:42 PM
#7
Posts: 589
Shit map for Allies, absolutely dreadful map for both USF and Brits.
22 Dec 2015, 16:49 PM
#8
Posts: 1122
Limited resources as well and allies often gardened by bad starting positions (double USF on left open side for example).
Also when soviets don't go armored assault this happens. 34-85 could easily won that game, but i guess you know that without me.
Also when soviets don't go armored assault this happens. 34-85 could easily won that game, but i guess you know that without me.
22 Dec 2015, 16:59 PM
#9
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Limited resources as well and allies often gardened by bad starting positions (double USF on left open side for example).
Sorry have to disagree. The allies were north. And good mixed. Soviets mg+ usa right side. And left side brit+ usa. Best combo for allies!
Or was is it just an example , why this map is bad?^^
22 Dec 2015, 17:31 PM
#10
Posts: 1122
Sorry have to disagree. The allies were north. And good mixed. Soviets mg+ usa right side. And left side brit+ usa. Best combo for allies!
Or was is it just an example , why this map is bad?^^
Yeah i meant in general. If you ever get double usf left vs serious team as allies you are beyond gardened.
23 Dec 2015, 02:15 AM
#11
4
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
sign up for 4v4 invitational stars
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
42 | |||||
31 | |||||
21 | |||||
6 | |||||
0 | |||||
14 | |||||
9 | |||||
5 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236