Login

russian armor

=★= vs Randoms

by Sturmpanther 21st December 2015, 20:42 PM
21 Dec 2015, 20:42 PM
#1
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

What a game!!!

Fucking long game. Tanks, arty, Inf.

Allies Rag 2 with 38/0 vs Randoms: 118, 5, 230, and 87 ( after they won vs rank2. So they got a lot of positions)

Allies Top side ( North) and axis bottom side ( South)

p.s. Aguany pls use your manpower; you had 1000-2000 manpower the whole game^^

gg






21 Dec 2015, 20:49 PM
#2
avatar of Spearhead

Posts: 162

Well, thanks for the "wp"

21 Dec 2015, 20:55 PM
#3
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

Guess you are talking about brits and soveits?.
Well ISu is rightside horrible. And then you had no 120 mm.
Brits; well this avre did his job lol^^. One tiem he killed everything. But its too risky to use this unit.
21 Dec 2015, 21:06 PM
#4
avatar of Soheil

Posts: 658

incridible, gj b o i s
21 Dec 2015, 21:18 PM
#5
avatar of Spearhead

Posts: 162

Correct SP. Well, maybe commander choice wasnt the problem. But the mistake was certainly to not go for the baserape.
22 Dec 2015, 12:28 PM
#6
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

I also think commander choices could have been better. imo the Royal Engineering is more an early/mid game commander for emplacement play to lock down a sector which can work sometimes very well, but sadly there were no emplacement play this game and AEC upgrade instead of bofors. Two commets and tac support arty could have ended the game with a big push

gg anyways :)

PS. this map is unbalanced favoring north side btw imo :) with the very strong position u get in north side's fuel with those houses, but I still like to veto this as allies, cause the OKW blob and KT makes it very hard to counter, also in ur case of double USF, I think p47 could have been better imo.
22 Dec 2015, 15:42 PM
#7
avatar of Tatatala

Posts: 589

Shit map for Allies, absolutely dreadful map for both USF and Brits.
22 Dec 2015, 16:49 PM
#8
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122

Limited resources as well and allies often gardened by bad starting positions (double USF on left open side for example).

Also when soviets don't go armored assault this happens. 34-85 could easily won that game, but i guess you know that without me.
22 Dec 2015, 16:59 PM
#9
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Dec 2015, 16:49 PMJadame!
Limited resources as well and allies often gardened by bad starting positions (double USF on left open side for example).


Sorry have to disagree. The allies were north. And good mixed. Soviets mg+ usa right side. And left side brit+ usa. Best combo for allies!

Or was is it just an example , why this map is bad?^^
22 Dec 2015, 17:31 PM
#10
avatar of Jadame!

Posts: 1122



Sorry have to disagree. The allies were north. And good mixed. Soviets mg+ usa right side. And left side brit+ usa. Best combo for allies!

Or was is it just an example , why this map is bad?^^


Yeah i meant in general. If you ever get double usf left vs serious team as allies you are beyond gardened.
23 Dec 2015, 02:15 AM
#11
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

sign up for 4v4 invitational stars
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

891 users are online: 891 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49079
Welcome our newest member, Rodfg15
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM