Symbiosis vs RunToTheSun

Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2014, 03:17 AMc0mpl3x1ty

Look another cast from someone who isn't nearly qualified enough to cast games at this level

Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2014, 03:25 AMVonIvan

Beautiful cast.

Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2014, 03:57 AMdarkerdayzud

Great game! ...but I have to ask (and please know I am not criticizing but only looking for insight..I am aware these players are much better than me)

Warning: Slight Spoilers Ahead

As a Wer player..

1- Why would you wait 15 minutes to build a Pak and PGren Squad ?? Isnt this standard in both match ups? Why float 800+ manpower? What does Symbiosis know that I dont?

2- Why not build the mortar HT if your going with this doctrine?? But build the standard mortar team instead?? Just the incendiary barrage itself makes it worth it...plus it is more accurate.

3- Why build a 2nd Tiger when your facing this kind of composition?? Wouldn't 2 paks have been better option? I feel the T34s would've gone down way earlier.

Trying to get better at this game...so if some of you good players have feedback on this..Id love to know...because logically I dont get it. To me with these choices the game wouldve been over much sooner.

Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2014, 09:03 AMSymbiosis

Well I could try and answer your questions
1) A panzer 4 is much more effective in shutting down his t70 harrasment than paks/grens are, and a P4 also allows me to harras him. Even though the t2 is only 15 fuel, I'd rather wait (if possible of course) for my p4, and then build t2 and spend my spare manpower.

2)The mortar ht is a strong unit, but I don't wanna delay my tiger or p4 by 2 minutes since the mortar costs 50 fuel. And a regular mortar only costs manpower, of which I had plenty.

3) Mobility. With 2 tigers I can use one to control the mid, and use the other to shut down harrasment or harras myself. A 2nd tiger gives me more mapcontrol, while a 2nd pak doesn't.