Login

russian armor

бла бла бла

by jove 15th September 2014, 08:59 AM
Semoskiy (4)
Semoskiy
  • [00:07:10] jov5: ??
Honor
Honor it
1
Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.15318
Duration: 00:32:24
15 Sep 2014, 08:59 AM
#1
avatar of jove

Posts: 45 | Subs: 3

difficult to play against such imby
15 Sep 2014, 10:39 AM
#2
avatar of SageOfTheSix

Posts: 1048

Permanently Banned
I wonder why he left. Maybe he had to leave..
15 Sep 2014, 11:31 AM
#3
avatar of jove

Posts: 45 | Subs: 3

15 Sep 2014, 11:41 AM
#4
avatar of DavidKh

Posts: 110

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Sep 2014, 11:31 AMjove
I was lucky

btw you are luckiest player I have ever seen ;)
15 Sep 2014, 11:56 AM
#5
avatar of jove

Posts: 45 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Sep 2014, 11:41 AMDavidKh

btw you are luckiest player I have ever seen ;)
хахаххахахаyes
15 Sep 2014, 13:00 PM
#6
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Sep 2014, 08:59 AMjove
difficult to play against such imby


Imbalanced in what way, aa ht, m8, or thunderbolt?
15 Sep 2014, 13:58 PM
#7
avatar of OnCe_Ov3R

Posts: 195

I left cos i was frustrated and had a call i needed to make. Trying to break down sniper and mortar covered by paks mgs and stug e is very frustrating, its hard to keep your rifles alive and when he has 3 at guns i cant just rush in with vehicles
15 Sep 2014, 14:28 PM
#8
avatar of Vladislavs89

Posts: 116

and when he has 3 at guns i cant just rush in with vehicles

Forgive me for being forward, but you are not really supposed to "rush in" with vehicles. You are sort of supposed to use a thing called "tactics"...
15 Sep 2014, 14:31 PM
#9
avatar of Cruzz

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41


Forgive me for being forward, but you are not really supposed to "rush in" with vehicles. You are sort of supposed to use a thing called "tactics"...


With a faction that lacks any realistic indirect fire options unless you pick Infantry commander? Cool.

15 Sep 2014, 14:43 PM
#10
avatar of OnCe_Ov3R

Posts: 195


Forgive me for being forward, but you are not really supposed to "rush in" with vehicles. You are sort of supposed to use a thing called "tactics"...


against a guy with little at, it might be a viable tactic to rush in with your vehicles (get behind one pak for instance), but this was not viable here, hence why i said "i cant rush in" etc
15 Sep 2014, 18:39 PM
#11
avatar of SageOfTheSix

Posts: 1048

Permanently Banned
Now that I start to think about it, USF tanks are some of the only tanks that get Smoke non-doctrinal. I wonder if these can reliably be used offensively to break formations.
15 Sep 2014, 20:11 PM
#12
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

Now that I start to think about it, USF tanks are some of the only tanks that get Smoke non-doctrinal. I wonder if these can reliably be used offensively to break formations.


They can, but only the shermans have that ability and people dont like using them so you never see this ability used.
15 Sep 2014, 22:55 PM
#13
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Sep 2014, 08:59 AMjove
difficult to play against such imby


welcome to coh2.org!:o
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

548 users are online: 548 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM