That's balance uhm .......
by
Rage_of_the_reich
29th May 2014, 07:23 AM
No chat in this replay.
29 May 2014, 07:23 AM
#1
Posts: 65
I mean I completly dominated this game. Then he somehow called in his T34/85's and almost won the battle ........
29 May 2014, 08:57 AM
#2
Posts: 273
If u would take a look at ur replay, u would see that soviet completly dominated the early game and stored huge fuel. That s why he called in t34/85s.
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
29 May 2014, 09:24 AM
#3
Posts: 65
If u would take a look at ur replay, u would see that soviet completly dominated the early game and stored huge fuel. That s why he called in t34/85s.
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
Ye, i think Elite Troops is far too strong. I usually don't chose this doctrine, but it was my last chance to win ....
If I really wanted to win this game without an Ace I simply could have waited for a regular Tiger so i didnt have to tech up (which is far to expensive in my Opinion)and his T34 wouldn't stand a chance aswell .......
29 May 2014, 14:35 PM
#4
Posts: 273
If u wouldnt tech up, he would have 2 of t34/85s. Even having Tiger Ace, he nearly killed it with single t34/85. Having 2 of them, clearly he would kill normal tiger easily.. Imo there were no chance to win except that too strong commander..
Idk maybe u would do better micro, ur tiger would kill both of them.
Idk maybe u would do better micro, ur tiger would kill both of them.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
91 | ||
 |
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
134 | ||
|
|
|
|
79 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43163.872+9
- 2.59482.879+8
- 3.14839.791+7
- 4.13344.751+7
- 5.286162.638+4
- 6.18151.780+4
- 7.313114.733+9
- 8.377255.597+3
- 9.14265.686+10
- 10.17773.708+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1364
Board Info
241 users are online:
241 guests
1 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
62 posts in the last month
6 posts in the last week
62 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53539
Welcome our newest member, phimsexvietsub88
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, phimsexvietsub88
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM