That's balance uhm .......
by
Rage_of_the_reich
29th May 2014, 07:23 AM
No chat in this replay.
29 May 2014, 07:23 AM
#1
Posts: 65
I mean I completly dominated this game. Then he somehow called in his T34/85's and almost won the battle ........
29 May 2014, 08:57 AM
#2
Posts: 273
If u would take a look at ur replay, u would see that soviet completly dominated the early game and stored huge fuel. That s why he called in t34/85s.
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
29 May 2014, 09:24 AM
#3
Posts: 65
If u would take a look at ur replay, u would see that soviet completly dominated the early game and stored huge fuel. That s why he called in t34/85s.
And u would see that u have not any mid game antitank capability(teller,pak) until t34s arrived, so he went directly into ur base.
**And u would see that u r losing a fight because u dont predict and prepare against any mechanized assault due to giving fuels.
And finally u would see that while losing, u won by one click button thanks to "pay to win" commander altough u have big strategic mistake which is **
Sorry bro u r totaly wrong. But u r right in one thing which is "balance uhm..."
Ye, i think Elite Troops is far too strong. I usually don't chose this doctrine, but it was my last chance to win ....
If I really wanted to win this game without an Ace I simply could have waited for a regular Tiger so i didnt have to tech up (which is far to expensive in my Opinion)and his T34 wouldn't stand a chance aswell .......
29 May 2014, 14:35 PM
#4
Posts: 273
If u wouldnt tech up, he would have 2 of t34/85s. Even having Tiger Ace, he nearly killed it with single t34/85. Having 2 of them, clearly he would kill normal tiger easily.. Imo there were no chance to win except that too strong commander..
Idk maybe u would do better micro, ur tiger would kill both of them.
Idk maybe u would do better micro, ur tiger would kill both of them.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43163.872+9
- 2.57580.878+14
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.313114.733+9
- 5.12744.743+1
- 6.194101.658-1
- 7.282161.637+1
- 8.371284.566-1
- 9.17773.708+3
- 10.14059.704+7
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1354
Board Info
394 users are online:
394 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
79 posts in the last month
14 posts in the last week
79 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53178
Welcome our newest member, b52clubbapp
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, b52clubbapp
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM