Operation Charlie Fox Rules Update
Posts: 951
Posts: 974 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3
Relic ruined the Turney, thx gg relic, im really pissed off. Sorry but that i have to admit
Jeez it's not that dire. It's a 4-day tourney and this is only for day 1. Next week's hotfix should solve most of the problems listed here. The tourney will still produce many, many great games, and we might actually see something other than Rifle Company for USF!
Posts: 197 | Subs: 1
Posts: 239
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
As there has been a certain amount of disquiet about the exclusions, it may be helpful if I also mention, that the staff thread runs to 6 pages and involves over 40 Staff members contributing to it. The decision was taken on a vote.
This project has involved terrific support from the community and we hope that the interest in it will be widespread. We are most anxious that the game is displayed in its best light
We also know that some people will be disappointed by the decision - that is only natural, since the staff vote itself was not 100% one-sided. To those who are frustrated, i can only apologise. The decision was taken for the greater good and we are as anxious as you are, for the tourney to succeed and to showcase the game. We are conscious that if things went wrong, the blame will lie on our shoulders.
We started the process on the basis of all commanders included and no bulletins. I am afraid that the recent patch problems are what started the discussion, and things spread from there.
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
Posts: 862
Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1
Their only infantry-based suppression platform is eliminated. Sad day for OCF.
Posts: 20
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
why the ban of elite troops?
because i've never seen Hans using other doctrine that Tiger Ice
Posts: 2
Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2
The only useful US commander always gets banned -.-
This..
Posts: 951
As there has been a certain amount of disquiet about the exclusions, it may be helpful if I also mention, that the staff thread runs to 6 pages and involves over 40 Staff members contributing to it. The decision was taken on a vote.
This project has involved terrific support from the community and we hope that the interest in it will be widespread. We are most anxious that the game is displayed in its best light
We also know that some people will be disappointed by the decision - that is only natural, since the staff vote itself was not 100% one-sided. To those who are frustrated, i can only apologise. The decision was taken for the greater good and we are as anxious as you are, for the tourney to succeed and to showcase the game. We are conscious that if things went wrong, the blame will lie on our shoulders.
We started the process on the basis of all commanders included and no bulletins. I am afraid that the recent patch problems are what started the discussion, and things spread from there.
An intelligent and reasoned post which I support one hundred per cent. Sadly, this is the internet, where intelligence and reason are doomed.
Posts: 218
Livestreams
89 | |||||
28 | |||||
2 | |||||
131 | |||||
24 | |||||
10 | |||||
3 | |||||
3 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM