Getting T34/76 will make soviet player run out of control groups. Now In late game you ussualy have 9-10 control groups occupied even using better tanks than T34/76. Puting 2 units in 1 group is a way to lose those units esp tanks cuz they block the path for each other. Only double mortar, sniper and ATG are OK in 1 group.
My suggestion:
1. Replace T34\76 with 85 version.
2. Remove ML20 from 1v1 game (with its fire rate its bad in 1v1, dmg is irrelevant here cuz it cant hit target). And put t34/76 on its spot with 7 CP requirement.
Why T4 T34/76 is a mistake
8 Sep 2015, 18:42 PM
#1
Posts: 1487
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
9 Sep 2015, 04:27 AM
#2
Posts: 49
I like ml20 and what if instead of coming at 7cp it comes with tier 3 (honestly I would just like to see 76 and 85 buff and price increase to make them viable, 85 being soviet panther)
9 Sep 2015, 08:03 AM
#3
8 
Posts: 2470
i run all my same unit types in one control group, tanks included, since it's too damnn hard to differentiate control groups in a battle. if i need to micro one particular tank i just select it. there is a micro tax with any kind of spam though.
9 Sep 2015, 08:16 AM
#4
4 
Posts: 369
Lol, if control groups are your problem, just reserve one for the T34?
9 Sep 2015, 08:22 AM
#5
1 
Posts: 609
Lol, if control groups are your problem, just reserve one for the T34?
I think aaa's problems go beyond this
| Playercard of Array | |||||||||||||||||||
|
9 Sep 2015, 09:11 AM
#6
Posts: 954
+1 to stock T-34/85, I see no reason why they aren't stock unit
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
9 Sep 2015, 09:14 AM
#7
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
+1 to stock T-34/85, I see no reason why they aren't stock unit
This is because only a handful of them were ever made compared to tens of tousands of panthers, pumas or ostwinds
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
9 Sep 2015, 09:29 AM
#8
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Give it extra pen and range at Vet3 and we're done.
9 Sep 2015, 10:06 AM
#9
Posts: 4928
+1 to stock T-34/85, I see no reason why they aren't stock unit
What do with T-34/76 then?
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
9 Sep 2015, 10:08 AM
#10
Posts: 1653
The T-34/76 is useless. So they don't need it Kappa
9 Sep 2015, 10:14 AM
#11
Posts: 578
MT
It's Relic's responsibility.
9 Sep 2015, 10:47 AM
#12
Posts: 354
What do with T-34/76 then?
It could be in doctrines that have T-34/85 upgrade now. Make it like Valentine, 7-8 CP with useful ability for intelligence (T-70 on steroids) or like command panzer, with useful aura, but higher price, or change it to OT-34/76 with crappy flamer.
9 Sep 2015, 12:25 PM
#13
Posts: 954
What do with T-34/76 then?
made them ram harder and replace the call-in slot of T-34/85. But really, T-34/85 is not a stock unit feels really bad....they are mass produced since end of 1943....they join every battle at eastern front during the late war stage..First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
9 Sep 2015, 12:57 PM
#14
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
No we cant give soviets a ijdoctrinal t34/85. Imagine those axis whinners that have first heart attack after british launch , second after riflemen buff and easy 8 buff and now t34/85 ?
No we dont want to lovver axis player base because of many unintended deaths
No we dont want to lovver axis player base because of many unintended deaths
9 Sep 2015, 15:38 PM
#15
Posts: 118
I quite like the 76, they're really dirt cheap and with the pop cap decrease you can royally spam them. Shame they have been reverted from 8 pop cap to 10
9 Sep 2015, 16:40 PM
#16
Posts: 2070
i want to like the t34/76. They should make it 8 pop cap instead of 10 like they are proposing. However, i still think it will be unattractive since the tank sucks
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
9 Sep 2015, 16:56 PM
#17
Posts: 670
I wanna be the very best
Like no one ever was
To build them is my real test
To ram them is my cause
I will travel across the map
Spamming far and wide
Each T-34 to understand
The power that's inside
T-34, (gotta ram them all) it's you and me
I know its my destiny
/76, oh, you're my best friend
In a VP we must defend
T-34, (gotta ram them all) OKW so OP
Our courage will pull us through
You ram me and I'll ram you
(T-34) Gotta ram'em all
Like no one ever was
To build them is my real test
To ram them is my cause
I will travel across the map
Spamming far and wide
Each T-34 to understand
The power that's inside
T-34, (gotta ram them all) it's you and me
I know its my destiny
/76, oh, you're my best friend
In a VP we must defend
T-34, (gotta ram them all) OKW so OP
Our courage will pull us through
You ram me and I'll ram you
(T-34) Gotta ram'em all
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
10 Sep 2015, 00:57 AM
#18
Posts: 647
t70 kills infantry much better and cheaper while being available faster.
su85/su76 are so much more effective against armour.
there's so much better alternatives to them and they do nothing on the field.
just make them good at something.
su85/su76 are so much more effective against armour.
there's so much better alternatives to them and they do nothing on the field.
just make them good at something.
10 Sep 2015, 01:55 AM
#19
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
T34/76 used to beTHE anti infantry tank in the game. It had amazing anti infantry firepower at the expense of its anti tank firepower. This had to be changed because it meant that soviet T3 was hard countered by a single tank.
However, with the great changes to soviet teching, I think that it is time to revert the old t34/76 changes and make it into an anti infantry tank again. Have it cost 100 fuel and become a better version of the T70, with better hp, armor, and slightly more at.
Boom, t34/76 becomes a perfectly viable lategame unit, that serves an unfilled roll in its factions lategame.
However, with the great changes to soviet teching, I think that it is time to revert the old t34/76 changes and make it into an anti infantry tank again. Have it cost 100 fuel and become a better version of the T70, with better hp, armor, and slightly more at.
Boom, t34/76 becomes a perfectly viable lategame unit, that serves an unfilled roll in its factions lategame.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
318 | ||
 |
|
|
190 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
517 users are online:
517 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM